Why would they spend millions if they didn’t?
After having listened to interviews with the No Kings protesters, I am much more convinced that they are so emotionally driven that they are unwilling to consider facts and reality. The campaign of deception that they have been captured by is very sophisticated and very pervasive, a super powerful echo chamber. There are too many simple logical truths that are being completely ignored. There’s a combination of the old claims and the new ones. These are manufactured claims designed to justify the complete demolition of the free world, and of western culture, for the purpose of installing an elite controlled world economy based on cooperation as opposed to competition.
As I’ve written in past posts, the desperate elites will never give up attempting to capture the United States simply because its wealth engine is the primary obstruction to their progress. George Soros and the like have mastered the art of deception that installs these claims and justifies them with the complete denial of the reality of economics and human nature. He demonstrates enough intelligence to understand that he is doing so. Spending $7.5 M on a day of protests with the intention of weakening the overwhelmingly popular policies of President Trump, somehow convinced that the perception of large crowds sway public opinion in the US, he intended to capture a significant portion of the undecided, confused youth and soften the moderate republicans into compromising their committed stance on the traditional values of this country. He moved the money through his Open Society Action Fund to an organization know as Indivisble, which donated to a group known as 50501, which represents 50states, 50 protests, one movement. It is a loose organization of leftist groups, including Antifa, which was started on Reddit by user Evolved_Fungi. This is a political action organization whose purpose is to fund protests against the president. Measured by the gross under-representation of young people and ethnic minorities, he failed miserably! Where he is still winning is with the anti ICE protests. Not by the numbers of protesters but by the increasing violence against law enforcement he is supporting. His financial support of this is now under investigation. He strongly believes that violence only motivates the radicals and their elected representatives to act against the Trump administration.
Mr. Soros has been trying to take advantage of a growing population of disillusioned young people in the US for decades. Now, the majority of those youth are approaching or in their retirement years, as we have seen in these protests. Make no mistake, Mr. Soros believes that the only way the United States will become dependent on the rest of the world for what it needs to survive is if it adopts a socialist economic system. He will continue to fund false protests and script false claims in order to achieve this. He is out to destroy the very economic system that allowed him to achieve this potential because he is a true elite, one that believes that only by his unique genius could he use his wealth for ‘the common good’. It is well known that this is exactly the economic system that Hitler sold the Germans. If more and more of our young people are waking up to this truth, then how is he able to raise up a totally communist mayoral candidate in our biggest city, the capital of capitalism? If it wasn’t for the indoctrination of our college youth by the pervasive globalist and socialist elite professors, it could have never happened. Obama was very heavily impressioned by the socialist lectures given at Cooper Union and African cultural fairs in Brooklyn while attending Columbia University in New York City. He was later destined to empower that teaching at universities across the country through his foundation, including his alma mater.
The simple paradoxical claim that the “No Kings” protesters said they represented was that President Trump was behaving like a king. A king does not relinquish control of his helpers to afford his kingdom greater individual autonomy to determine their own economic destiny. A king does not fight to protect the least of his kingdom regardless of their loyalty or lack of. A king does not empower the private employer to maximize wages and employment opportunities regardless of loyalty or lack of. A king does not fight to make sure that the wealth created by his subjects stays in their own pockets and not his. Dictators are known for lining their own pockets first, then using the remainder of their wealth to force loyalty from their subjects.
Authoritarianism is the use of governing power to force legal citizens to behave against their conscience, to take an experimental vaccination that had never been proven to protect against the lethality of the targeted virus, to behave as if they agree with the purported concepts of DEI and gender fluidity, to pay for the administration of DEI and gender fluidity. It is the use of governing power to force the private sector to govern with values they don’t necessarily agree with and to incur significant costs that aren’t incentivized by the free market and aren’t proven to be of benefit to society.
Yes, even a king and a president will rightly fight to make sure that his subjects aren’t locked into working their butts off in order to pay for the welfare of those who broke into the kingdom. Along the same lines, he will do everything he can to expel those who broke in, simply for the logical reason that anyone who breaks in through the back door cannot intend to benefit your home. In this case, the very act of breaking in demonstrates that there is no intention to respect and follow the law. Illegal immigrants have no intention of defending the US Constitution for the purpose it was written. What motivated their break in is entitlement. This is why they cannot logically be motivated to defend the US Constitution for the purpose it was written. They don’t have the motivation of our legal immigrants that came in through the front door, subjecting themselves to a thorough vetting, and willing to start from scratch without unnecessary government assistance. If you came illegally and realize you made a mistake, then you will take the trouble to take the time to leave and come through the front door. If you have demonstrated that you are a liability to the United States as a criminal either in your home country or while you were in the United States, then how do you expect to be welcome? What other country would welcome you?
If you were a protester, you most likely have become convinced that illegal immigration is not a threat to our country. The truth you avoid is that if you reward just one person for breaking through our border, it completely depreciates the value of legal citizenship. It forces the country to relinquish its prerogative to incentivize or dis-incentivize legal immigration. This is a basic tenet of national sovereignty. If you understand this, then you have no value for our national sovereignty. That means that when the country is forced to extend welfare to more and more illegals and it affects yours or your children’s chances of employment, yours or their salaries, and constant and steadily increasing inflation decreases your standard of living, you or your children won’t mind. What our European friends are now finding out the hard way is that in a relatively short period of time, the country becomes impoverished, and that same cohort of illegals protest for more and more free stuff. This is the reality of economics and human nature which you must deny in order to support illegal immigration. One by one, our European friends are closing their borders. If these same illegals would have the fortitude to vote for religious and economic freedom and value the sovereignty of the country they broke into, impoverishment could have been avoided. But just recent history shows us that they have a short fuse and riot for guaranteed employment and welfare. As in France, Germany, the UK and others. Not only are many nations closing their borders to illegals but they are actively deporting them. Are they also being governed by kings? I can tell you that their legal citizens support border security and the deportation of illegals.
Those that benefit a free constitutional republic as ours by contributing of their best, expecting the reward of economic opportunity, are the strongest defenders of our Constitution and our national sovereignty. This is the history of immigration to our country. It is those immigrants that played a huge part in building the country and defended our freedoms and sovereignty, many with their young lives! The United States is not a refuge for those that believe they are entitled, for those that do not care if they are welcomed legally. Just as corporations have to be vetted and approved to move to the US, so do individuals. Legal immigrants are not threatened by our religious freedom exercised by all faiths, including the Christian faith. They know the difference between freedom of religion and the manufactured freedom from religion. Even while the immigrants of the early 1900s lived among their own ethnic neighborhoods in most of our large cities, they greatly appreciated their guaranteed freedoms and were proud to be American because they came from real authoritarianism where their equity was owned at the pleasure of their government, where their economic opportunities were dependent on their loyalty to their king, and where they were persecuted for their religious faith. They were miles apart from the “No Kings” protesters.
George Soros is trying to transform the United States into a socialist country. Yet, the illegals are running from their socialist homelands to a capitalist country in hopes of “A better life”. Do you realize that you are being sponsored by a billionaire who is trying to transform the country into just the economic system the illegals are running from. How does that make any sense?
Finally, George Soros and his son know that you either don’t realize or don’t care that he paid for you to protest with your paradoxical claims, with a misguided understanding of the purpose of the US Constitution. If you really search the truth, you will come to realize that it was the result of having lived as legal citizens under a real king who did exactly the opposite of what President Trump is doing today.
- George Soros’ foundation in trouble? Trump announces big move against billionaire after massive ‘No Kings’ protests in US https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/global-trends/george-soros-foundation-in-trouble-trump-announces-big-move-against-billionaire-after-massive-no-kings-protests-in-us/articleshow/124712258.cms?from=mdr
- Soros foundations helping fund anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ protests nationwide https://www.foxnews.com/politics/soros-foundation-helping-fund-anti-trump-no-kings-protests-nationwide