Wolf Beerel

THE EMBOLDENMENT OF THE TRUE CONSERVATIVE

The events of the last 10 days cannot but totally embolden the true conservative who is living in the context of the race to steal every freedom granted to him by the US Constitution. This race being run by the most powerful globalists around the world is fast approaching the point of no return. Soon there will be no return to the normalcy of the individual freedom of expression, freedom of religion, or freedom of the pursuit of happiness. We will never be able to return to feeling safe to even think independently, to choose our lifestyle, our vocation, our spiritual beliefs. Most importantly, we will not be able to return to prioritizing our loyalties to our God, to our family, and to our country. We will be forced to accept basic life values that support global citizenship. We will be forced to prioritize our loyalty to the global movement over that to our God, our family and our country.

Parents will become their children’s worst enemies. The globalists have created the world’s most effective candy man – the activist American public school teacher. These teachers have become expert in convincing our children that they are entitled to a guaranteed life – a guaranteed family-sustaining job, free education, free transportation, etc.. There will be no way any parent could compete with the intensity of student indoctrination from preschool through college that will have evolved in just a few short years. They will not just censor the realization of basic human truths, but engineer the group think and attitudes that facilitate this indoctrination. The children will eventually demonize every closely held value their parents have. The federal government will have become their authority for all their moral values. Any resistance in supporting the federal government’s authority will be characterized as a lack of moral character. This is the very reason Biden cannot call out the NEA for refusing to go back to the classroom. Biden’s executive orders were fashioned to open the gates to allow elite groups of people to control the educational curriculum, and to redistribute wealth from the middle class to the elitist heads of federal agencies in the name of helping the poor and the minorities. Our tax money will go mostly into the pockets of a new army of government agency employees. Many other executive orders were directed at creating multiple new regulatory bodies such as the COVID 19 Health Equity Task Force and the COVID 19 Response Coordinator, whose functions are to regulate and control the services and actions of the states that are already in place. This is why he quickly characterized the implementation of Trump’s COVID 19 plan nonexistent, claiming that COVID 19 testing and vaccine distribution has been too slow, when in fact his declared goal of 100 million vaccines in the first 100 days actually fell short of Trump’s actual vaccination rate. So now, for example, COVID 19 testing and distribution of the vaccine will take longer and cost the taxpayer at least twice as much. Other executive orders just duplicate what the states are already doing, such as the FEMA directed federal community vaccination centers. Expanding the federal payroll, creating jobs with benefits that duplicate or regulate those with state funded jobs or government contractors is a favorite way of making states dependent on the federal government for more and more functions. This is the socialist’s favorite way of forcing government loyalty into the culture of the industry, its work culture and its management of human resources. Biden is tripling the cost of government overnight by executive fiat. The more costly the government, the higher the taxes. The higher the taxes, the more dependents on the government. Eventually, not enough people will be able to pay the taxes required to sustain that many government dependents. This is exactly how every socialist state fails. It runs out of its own citizen’s money! Then in order to remain in power, it contains the poverty amongst its own people, holding on to the remaining wealth. Eventually it has no recourse but to own and control the production of its goods and services and demand total loyalty from its citizens. Some of these failed states have progressed further into a never ending transition between communism and military dictatorship. Biden will not waste an opportunity to emphasize to the unaware how there are no other solutions to the country’s problems that requires a huge government expenditure, robbing the futures of the children who aren’t old enough to understand. The principle reason for this approach is to create the moral imperative for this overwhelming expenditure. Those opposed will be quickly characterized by the media as being insensitive and unpatriotic. The value of individual self-reliance and local government self-reliance flies directly in the face of this man’s desperate race to grow the federal government into a monster controlling the values and loyalty of our children and the actions of the rest of us. This is not only intended to control the expanse and distribution of healthcare, but also every other facet of life our lives.

Indeed, one integral determinant of the country’s culture is the range of choices people create and have in the free market. It is the free market by which people make choices according to their values. Consequently, it is the free market that allows the people to choose their values. As soon as the price of goods are artificially changed, those goods are no longer in the free market. As long as people are free to choose to buy a product for a stated price, it remains in the free market. Not until people are forced to buy it for that stated price, does it remain in the free market.

Biden, as a perfectly collaborative globalist head of state, is out to suffocate the free market in the United States. Indeed, it is the free market in the US that poses as a formidable obstacle in controlling its culture. Biden knows full well that he is actually serving the globalist movement at the price of the greatest free economy in the world. In any country, the free market is at the mercy of its government as it has the potential to nurture it or to squelch it altogether. The 1.9 T stimulus bill is absolutely the opposite of a stimulus. It will only serve to help people pay a few bills and give them a false hope for their free market jobs and businesses. It also serves to restrain the demand for opening up the economy. His goal is to make the restaurant and entertainment industry dependent on the federal government in order to micromanage its culture, making it too costly for a private business to compete otherwise. The $15 minimum wage bill will be the final blow to our free economy. It will affect every industry in the US, making it too costly to run without government dependency. It is the fact that minimum wage did not support a family that prompted our young people to think twice about not furthering their education. Now those very same people who would have chosen to further their education, will be made just comfortable enough to raise their family and be forever dependent on the government, our taxes, for their income. So, in just one piece of legislation, Biden will have the opportunity to dumb down our young people even further. The goal of this scheme is to create a new socialist, dependent constituency amongst our most vulnerable young people. Contrary to popular belief, the “radical left” in the US is not just a group of elite “educated” intellectuals. It is the mouthpiece and arms of an international globalist movement run and paid for by a few a handful of billionaires. They are driven by the motive to impose their values on the entire world. Their world view is that only an entire world complicit to their values will save the world from worsening poverty and world war. It is no surprise that their economic success could make them feel that way, but according to those that appreciate their inherited freedoms and the sacrifices paid to defend them, those self entitled elites don’t have the right to implement their scheme at the expense of the constitutional freedoms of the United States.

To those that look forward to being told where

to work and live, who to be, and what to believe,

don’t bother to continue reading this blog.

To those that don’t want to be jailed for their publicly stated beliefs, whether in a church or a synagogue, or a public place, or in a public forum, you may want to compare your list of things to realize with mine. If so, then continue reading.

The ultimate human prison is the thought prison. That is how a portion of this world lives. The heads of state that sponsor these prisons claim the moral imperative – the survival of the state.

Wealth is not a stagnant commodity in a free economy. Wealth is what sustains human beings in a civilized society. It is constantly being produced and consumed. In a free economy, privately owned enterprises are rewarded for making things more valuable. That reward is called profit. An economy that uses enough of that profit to make things even more valuable creates more wealth, which in turn creates more employment and higher wages for all its people. Free enterprises compete with one another in the pursuit of producing more value. An enterprise that fails to make things more valuable with its profits ends up unable to compete against those in its industry that do. It is this competition that motivates an enterprise to risk its profits to do research and development in order to make things more valuable. An economy that is able to consistently grow wealth benefits the entire world. The United States has historically proven this to the world. The facts are already there, no matter how much they are avoided in the mainstream culture.

A controlled economy consumes its wealth due to a lack of competition. In a failed state, the most an enterprise with a valuable product can hope for is a small portion of the real profit and the public recognition of the state as an enticement for other enterprises in which loyalty to the state is highly valued. Eventually, the government reduces an industry to a few chosen enterprises which are obligated to produce whatever the government wants and whatever quantity the government wants. These enterprises largely profit the government and facilitate its economic agenda, eventually consuming the wealth of the people. The well known history of failed economic states and an awareness of present day global economics proves these basic concepts to be true.

The understanding of human nature and the imperfection of man is what motivates an educated person to contribute to an imperfect world without the endeavor or the collaboration to make the world perfect.

We must now effectively intervene, defend, and nurture the thought life of our children BEFORE it’s too late. This though, is easier said than done. The most effective way to a child’s attention is through their edification as people and as independent thinkers. What our children need to know is that government services do not evolve in a competitive environment and cost us all whether we benefit from those services or not. For that reason, morally, it should be the resource of last resort. Since government does not compete in the free market, it seeks to establish laws and regulations that force people to use its services. If you land in the hospital anywhere in the US, your nurse will wait in line to get your medications so that a computer can follow the rule of one: that only one nurse at a time will be able to pick up their patient’s meds one at a time, each one requiring a series of keystrokes and actions on the medication cabinet. The Affordable Care Act is a classic example. Establishing a tax penalty for not having it or an alternative form of health insurance is just the method that government would use to treat many other basic life needs if it was not effectively checked. Being dependent on government for healthcare is the ultimate goal of socialists so as to coerce and force your life decisions in support of their values. Eventually people won’t get enough care soon enough to overcome their health problems.

The real cavalry will launch the Brand New Culture of American Education and save the United States from the grip of the global elitist.

It will happen in the United States because ingrained in the fiber of its culture is the taste and need for basic freedoms. It is the only country in the world that has the moral will and constitutional support to salvage its own freedoms. It will be introduced by our new young and determined conservative politicians not committed to either political party. It will be administered by the most resourced middle aged adults that have been hungry for the chance to do this. It will be heavily supported by the most recent local conservative house and senate candidates that just announced their candidacies as challengers the socialist incumbents within their home districts. To the huge dismay of the NEA, it will be the greatest diversion of education tax money to school choice education tax credits at the county and state level. The learning relationship between the student and the teacher will be completely re-invented. The student will learn to understand what it means to be appreciated not for the color of their skin but for their value as a human being. They will learn to know what it feels like to be appealed to their intellect as opposed to their emotions. They will also learn to define their moral values to be consistent with their spiritual beliefs. This is what the globalists have succeeded in tearing apart in a very progressive, stealth fashion. They will become aware of the wizard behind the curtain that censored true history and re-defined basic value terms relevant to all aspects of life to coincide with those lies. They will learn the difference between seeking to achieve low standards dictated by government agencies and the satisfaction of competing with themselves to achieve their personal best. They will know what it means to be used for the sake of their skin color and their lack of motivation to learn, work, and realize who they really are! This will be a grass roots revolution that will not make the mainstream media, will not create social upheaval, and will not turn the heads of those who believe that “getting our country back” will require a more forceful, if not violent revolution. It will turn the heads of those government leaders currently spending our tax money to make sure this never happens!! They will make every effort to demean it, marginalize it, and eventually criminalize it. They will fail at every turn for the reasons discussed above!!

A Biden Administration as an Obama proxy

The Democrat Convention really brought to light the degree of incoherence and variability in the party and the extent to which they rely on their constituents hanging on simply to remove the president. They have not a single objective fact to hang their hat on. The elephant in the room was the lack of concern about the condition of violence in the cities and the lack of solutions for that unrest. So, who will they hang on too? Well to begin with, let’s examine what led to the Biden – Harris ticket. Biden can only talk about Trump’s character in terms of subjective deficits, that he is racist, divisive, having lack of respect for the minorities. Yet the president has a stack of contributions that he already made to the racial minorities. He simply doesn’t isolate and address the ‘gender minorities. Yet, they too, in their economic class have greatly benefited from president Trump. That may become a greater priority for them than a president who touts an acceptance of their lifestyle but cannot improve their economic opportunities. The most revealing speech was that of Obama, who failed to to credit Biden with any sense of potential as president except that he cares about people. By redefining our vocabulary when talking about democracy, all the while making plans to be able to restrict our freedoms, and touting the US Constitution as “having a guiding light”, while finding ways to restrict our rights as citizens and take the balance of power away from the people. This only reveals his objective in using this potential administration to further the globalist goals of the United Nations to redistribute wealth within the US and amongst the nations. Biden’s talk of solutions merely involves throwing tax money at the problems in order to force the appearance of economic parity amongst the races and genders. Let me make it very clear. Biden was the least competent democratic nominee and only clenched the nomination as a proxy for Obama and his objectives of making the United States subservient to the United Nations. The globalists, through a Biden administration hope to weaken the United States into submission to the United Nations, weakening its economic and political capital in the world so as to make it difficult for the US to support and defend Israel. It is still all about Israel! As Kamala Harris shines the threat of weaponizing law enforcement against our freedoms, she is best poised to help the globalists null our second amendment. The defund the police movement is actually a ploy to defund the sheriffs across the country. Once the sheriffs are out of the way it wouldn’t take much for these liberal city councils to take the AR 15s away from law abiding citizens. This would be the crucial first step to taking all guns away altogether. The more well informed sector of each of these minority classes will start to smell the stench of class politics. Even the minorities will not want to give up their individual freedoms and rights, even for the promise of a free living and a guaranteed job. It has been the minorities that are suffering the most in the face of the extreme restrictions to our economy perpetuated by the democrats. There is not only a silent majority being awakened on the part of the city residents and the better informed minorities that don’t live in the cities, but there will also be a serious awakening among the single parents and the 2 parent professionals who’s children will be left relatively unschooled. The other objective of the defund the police movement is to marginalize federal law enforcement while exacerbating unrest in as many cities as possible so as to create the illusion that the Trump administration is inept at handling it and therefore must be replaced by one that allows the UN to come in and establish its authority in those cities.

The Rise of the Silent Majority

In just the right timing, Chicago, just the right city, becomes the next city to blow up. At about 2:30 PM on Sunday, August 9th, a looter in the Englewood area shoots at the police upon being chased and is shot at in return. A facebook post at 6:30 shows a video of upset residents confronting officers, describing the suspect as a 15 year old boy when, in fact, it was a 20 year old man with a long criminal history, another perfect subject for provoking a police shooting. Obviously the video was made to trigger a large scale protest. At about 12:20 AM, ‘protesters’, estimated to be about a thousand, arrive in a caravan of cars, get out and immediately start looting and vandalizing the shops and restaurants in the most exclusive downtown Chicago area known as the Magnificent Mile. Illinois state police blocked off ramps into the downtown area. The CTA suspended bus and train service. Three police officers were taken to the hospital.

Upon discovering the Facebook post of the shooting video, the CPD made around a hundred arrests while police superintendent called the situation “an act of pure criminality”. Several dozen people showed up to protest but wound up with a standoff with police and promptly dispersed. So, as could be predicted, the Mayor, Lori Lightfoot heavily denounced the activity as felony criminal conduct and stated she was going to seek prosecution to the full extent of the law. She also implored the state’s attorney general Kim Foxx to follow through.

Now when we add up the facts at hand and see that the person who uploaded the video post with the misinformation regarding the suspect of the shooting is unnamed, no comment about whether or not that is being investigated, and the fact that this young man has a substantial criminal history, making him a rather desperate criminal, we start to see the lack of information regarding this perfect coincidence. Upon some reasonable reflection it may come to light that he would be an optimal victim to manipulate into becoming the actor of this scene. No one is questioning who the police informant was who called about him carrying the gun or what the nature of the interview was that prompted the young man to run and then pre-emptively fire at the police officers, causing enough injury to send 3 officers to the hospital. He was somehow given access to the gun illegally. Everyone seems to be concluding that the cause of the rioting was the incident itself. No one in the media is questioning how well organized and participated the riot response was. There are too many coincidences for this to be a naturally occurring event and a naturally occurring response. Why is the media not questioning the legitimacy of the stated reasons behind this whole event? How do they get their materials together in just a few hours? How come the media isn’t questioning the justification in persisting in the rioting if it is well known that the trigger was misinformation? How come there’s no comment from the city council ? Why doesn’t the media ask who is BLM ‘joining in solidarity’ with if the vast majority of participants were not peaceful protesters?

The actual cause of this riot is most likely a staged police shooting involving a naïve and desperate young man. This well endowed organization has the means and sophistication to pull this off and pay for it. They also have the means to pay the rioters that are reliably available on a moment’s notice to riot wherever they are so directed. This organization involves BLM members whose motivation is to force society to decriminalize their criminal lifestyle. The funding organization’s motive is to delegitimize the second amendment of our constitution so that the liberal politicians can force the entire population to come under the authority of the United Nations and their policing agency. As investigative journalist Bill O’Reilly has discovered, this global organization, most likely owned by globalist billionaires, such as George Soros, and other communist organizations, including organizations such as Thousand Currents within the US out of Oakland, California, is making a mad dash for our second amendment and the sovereignty of the United States, which is their biggest obstacle to achieving global authority. They most likely believe that a minority of people are defending the individual’s constitutional rights and care enough about maintaining national sovereignty. I can predict that these urban eruptions will continue to occur around the country while the UN becomes a more frequent interested voice against federal interference.

The silent majority actually consists of two major factions now, as a result of these riots. The longstanding constitutional and religious conservatives remain a strong and growing faction. The other newly developed faction is the more interesting. This is the urban residents whose lives are being disrupted financially and with growing insecurity. As they start to move out, these cities will suffer a rapidly shrinking tax base. This significantly growing faction of urban residents will thoroughly surprise the Biden camp and the democratic party come November. The only people that will stay will be those that either embrace the BLM movement or don’t feel immediately threatened by it. The silent majority faction of non urban African Americans are the other fast growing support for the republican party. They are now waking up to the many ways that they were just being used by the democratic party. They are following the example of Rob Smith, Iraq war veteran who was interviewed on Fox Nation’s “Reality Check”, who switched during the last election. Thereafter he describes coming to realize that the democratic party panders to the black parents that have no higher aspirations for their children. Once it becomes more clear that the BLM are just a tool being used to go after the second amendment, the democrats will implode. Once they realize the magnitude of support individual constitutional rights and national sovereignty really has in the United States, President Trump supporters will have another growth spurt.

UN Grossly Underestimates Low Income US City Residents

If low income city residents had any doubt, it has all been erased by the persistent neglect of their elected city officials. Any wonder as to how much violence and property destruction they may tolerate may be quelled by a clearer understanding of the motives behind the organizations funding this activity. A big clue lies in a recent communication from the UN.

The UN Security Council actually ordered the Trump administration to remove federal officers from Portland and other cities, claiming that the officers are using lethal force against peaceful protesters. This order comes after the UN had investigated the police shootings over a period of time and only came up with less than ten in the past year, almost all occurring while the suspects were attacking the police. Now the UN threatens the administration with “consequences” if they don’t pull back their federal officers. Make no mistake! The UN absolutely realizes they’re defending the rioters, not the peaceful protesters. They are intentionally taking the example of the mainstream media in creating the impression that the Trump administration is interfering with peaceful protesters for political gain. * I really didn’t see this sort of UN aggression coming this soon in the scheme of things. I thought they would wait until the National Guard and the Customs and Border Protection officers would be overwhelmed with rioters. It is utterly laughable that anyone could expect UN soldiers to come to the rioters recue. It only demonstrates the desperation of the UN for the rioters in Portland to succeed so that they could move on to other major cities across the US in the same vein. They may believe they have the support of enough of the American people. Yes, many of our young adults have been successfully indoctrinated into the globalist socialist agenda. Yet those same people absolutely do not believe that the way to societal change is through animal behavior. Even they would not support the legitimization of this in the US. The UN grossly underestimates the power of the silent majority, those that realize the power behind the vote and the right of the second amendment. Once the UN makes its intentions known to this sleeping giant, it will have demonstrated to the world its total ineptness and futility. They will only embolden this administration and their supporters. Sure, they’re desperate. They have invested billions, if not trillions of dollars into destabilizing the US by making every effort to remove power from the private sector, legally and economically. Now the objective is to remove the functional defense of our second amendment, the sheriffs across the country. This is their real objective with Portland today.

President Trump’s method of serving the state is to allow the state to use its resources first before requesting federal help. So it’s no surprise that yesterday he would welcome the use of state police to help stop the riots in Portland, while phasing out the federal officers. Yet, there should be no doubt that if the state cannot stop it, the feds will be back.

Pulling Out of the UN’s Clutches On the World’s Healthcare

The Trump administration formally withdrew from the WHO due to mishandling of COVID 19. The actual withdrawal is not valid until a year from July 6th as the UN requires one year’s notice in order to pull out.

The announcement in the liberal media is followed by rhetorical comments from the democrats, including Senator Menendez(D) calling the move “chaotic and incoherent”, and California US rep. (D) Eric Swalwell calling it “irresponsible, reckless and utterly incomprehensible”. The liberal media, in classic attack mode, only took statements from the democrats, not a single republican. This media is always ready to use any major decision president Trump makes to make him look dumb and inept. They never apologize after the results prove to be beneficial overall for the entire country. There is the assumption that the WHO has somehow helped us limit the actual damage of the virus, in terms of businesses lost, our death rate, and the extent of serious disease. Why is it not logical that the WHO was initially responsible for misrepresenting the true virility of this virus, claiming that it was not spread from human to human, recommending that travel bans were inappropriate. Why is it not logical that sensationalizing the spread of the virus now is just ridiculous fearmongering given that the death rate and rate of serious illness is actually decreasing as the virus spreads. Why is it not logical to withdraw form an agency that ignores a cheap and effective drug proven to prevent and limit the severity of the disease. These socialist activists actually believe that it is logical and beneficial to continue to pay a doctor who misses lifesaving opportunities and then is not able to help us in the midst of our disease, severely restricting our lifestyle without reasonable evidence. Once we stop using the total number of “cases” as the indicator for whether or not to increase social restrictions and extend lockdowns, president Trump’s decision to pull out of the WHO, which is an arm of the UN, will prove itself right and this media will grow silent. This is one of the first major attempts of the UN, through the WHO, to severely restrict our lifestyle at the expense of everyone’s livelihood without reasonable evidence of its effectiveness. It just happens to severely impact the private sector of the US, the UN’s biggest obstacle to globalization of healthcare.

Henry Ford Health System of Southeast Michigan enrolled 2,541 patients in an HCQ study where patients were given one of four alternatives: HCQ alone reduced mortality by 49%; HCQ with Azythromycin by 23.9%; and Azythromycin alone by 15%; placebo death rate was 26.4%. The study was published in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases. Patients were not randomly assigned as in the other studies but rather assigned according to their risk for cardiac complications. They were also treated early, before they developed severe symptoms, 82% within the first 24 hrs. of admission, 91% within the first 48 hrs. of admission. Critics stated that patients treated with HCQ were given twice the dose of steroid, dexamethasone, as those that did not receive HCQ.

Even as these reporters cover a successful HCQ trial, they try to discredit it because the patients were assigned to receive HCQ according to cardiac risk factors. They tout the two studies, the NIH study of 470 patients and the UK Oxford study of 11,000 patients that concluded that HCQ was not only ineffective but dangerous as the trials were stopped. These medical journalists know full well that for HCQ to work, it must be given early to those with no heart disease. They also know that it should be given with zinc to be maximally effective. There was no mention of the various successful studies which assigned patients according to this knowledge. They also tout their political bias by including that president Trump “touted the drug heavily”. In addition, they described the positive impression given by Peter Navarro, White House trade advisor as a final comment after the description of the two failed drug studies. This kind of reporting to include blatant political bias has become the pattern wherever the topic is HCQ. This is not only an effort to discredit HCQ but also scare people away from requesting HCQ for treatment. This report got out lightning fast in an effort to make sure it was reported in a negative light.

On July 3rd, the WHO modified their mask policy to recommend that only those that are sick and those caring for them should wear a mask.

On the same day, July 3rd, the US Surgeon General urges caution not to interpret a flat death rate while case numbers are increasing in the US as an improvement as the death rate may lag the new cases by at least 2 weeks. He uses this to make the case for wearing masks and social distancing among the young people during their 4th of July outings, so as not to give it to their older relatives. What he fails to mention is that the vast majority of young people may already have COVID 19 and the chances of passing it to their relatives while asymptomatic are extremely low. The soaring death rates of March and early April were mostly due to prison inmates, nursing home patients, and the immuno-compromised living within the community. The flattening death rate is due to the virus still spreading to those sectors of their society balanced off by the declining death rates in other states. The death rates themselves are most likely greatly inflated as the actual number of infected individuals is unknown due to the unknown number of asymptomatic infected people. The apparent decrease in death rates may also be due to the effectively increased testing, not necessarily an increase in infection rate. Why would we not be taking large enough samples of the asymptomatic younger population and getting an idea of the number of those individuals not yet infected. If we find that the young people are not a significant threat to one another, then maybe we could be wiser about what kind of businesses we choose to open up. It would make no sense to keep gyms closed just as these were vitally instrumental in encouraging our hardest working cohort of the younger population to maintain their overall health. It would also make no sense to keep parks and beaches closed for the same reasons. If we were really serious about preventing actual serious disease, we would simply continue to quarantine the symptomatic individuals, treating them early with HCQ and zinc. We would also emphasize the already known ways of bolstering immune health among our young population.

On July 4th, the WHO reversed their mask policy from Friday June 3rd to include everyone who is not able to do social distancing,” such as on pubic transportation, in shops or in other confined or crowded areas”. This was presumably in response to the increasing number of positive cases in certain US states and in other countries which are experiencing the same sort of increase. It went on to say that the the mask should consist of 3 layers made of fabric of different material. Once again, the WHO acting as if it was a fact that increasing numbers are a direct threat to the public, resulting from people not wearing masks. This came curiously after Dr. Fauci’s latest press conference in which he demonized those who would not wear a mask in public.

Dr. Bill Fisher, Houston, Texas ER physician described the number of asymptomatic cases coming into the ER, most likely for other reasons than COVID, and the 20 % that are testing positive. He asserts that they are just as contagious as “everyone else”, obviously including those that are symptomatic. This is the basic illogical inference that Dr. Fauci is single handedly trying to make for the entire world! This is the basis upon which he can, with a lot of authority, mandate that the entire country use lockdowns to slow the spread of infection. This infers that slowing the rate of spread of the virus will minimize the actual rate of death and serious illness. To mandate that we shut down the US economy and try to slow the spread of a virus that is not threatening to 90% of the population demonstrates a huge level of desperation. Again, these assertions have now become completely illogical, and if they actually studied the contagiousness of asymptomatic people who have tested positive and remain asymptomatic for 2 to 3 weeks, these assertions would be absolutely fraudulent. Dr. Fisher does state that the ICU beds are at capacity, but did not disclose how many of the COVID 19 patients are in the ICU due to COVID 19 and how many are testing positive but are not there due to progression of COVID 19.

Toward the end of March, Moody’s Analytics in India warned of a progressive financial decline in the world economy in the months to come as the world central banks lose the ability to bolster up their economies. The initial lockdowns in the US is expected to bring our GDP from 2.6% in January to -4.9 % in Mach to make an annual GDP of -0.5%. As of March 24th, Major firms were expected to cut employment and investment. President Trump has made a huge difference by allowing the Fed to produce stimulus checks which allowed many businesses to rehire those that were furloughed or rehired. Still, the extended lockdowns are absolutely unaffordable on the local level and on the macro level. If we continue to lock down, we will surely experience the economic fallout from the economic fallout in a worse way!. The liberal media and those voices from the unaffected will always produce the most moral outcry for continuing the lockdowns. They cry louder than those business owners now going under and those about to be unemployed. The social impact of a world economy in decline is inevitably going to be an increased infant mortality rate around the world and nationally in the US, a significant increase in diabetes and heart disease amongst the younger population, costing the US much more in social services.

Here then, are some major individuals and groups of notable experts around the world that would come to the president’s defense regarding his decision about pulling out form the WHO and encouraging certain governors to do everything possible to help businesses open up:

Twelve major scientists and researchers all agree that fearmongering and lockdowns were an unprecedented overreaction to COVID 19 based on the data available 3 months ago in March. They all agreed that the lockdowns are more likely to produce more harm than the virus itself due to the social upheaval and the economic decline it produces so quickly.

Thanks to Off-Guardian.org for putting this together.
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi is a specialist in microbiology. He was a professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene and one of the most cited research scientists in German history.

What he says:

We are afraid that 1 million infections with the new virus will lead to 30 deaths per day over the next 100 days. But we do not realise that 20, 30, 40 or 100 patients positive for normal coronaviruses are already dying every day.

[The government’s anti-COVID19 measures] are grotesque, absurd and very dangerous […] The life expectancy of millions is being shortened. The horrifying impact on the world economy threatens the existence of countless people. The consequences on medical care are profound. Already services to patients in need are reduced, operations cancelled, practices empty, hospital personnel dwindling. All this will impact profoundly on our whole society.

All these measures are leading to self-destruction and collective suicide based on nothing but a spook.
Dr Wolfgang Wodarg is a German physician specialising in Pulmonology, politician and former chairman of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. In 2009 he called for an inquiry into alleged conflicts of interest surrounding the EU response to the Swine Flu pandemic.

What he says:

Politicians are being courted by scientists…scientists who want to be important to get money for their institutions. Scientists who just swim along in the mainstream and want their part of it […] And what is missing right now is a rational way of looking at things.

We should be asking questions like “How did you find out this virus was dangerous?”, “How was it before?”, “Didn’t we have the same thing last year?”, “Is it even something new?”

That’s missing.

Dr Joel Kettner is professor of Community Health Sciences and Surgery at Manitoba University, former Chief Public Health Officer for Manitoba province and Medical Director of the International Centre for Infectious Diseases.

What he says:

I have never seen anything like this, anything anywhere near like this. I’m not talking about the pandemic, because I’ve seen 30 of them, one every year. It is called influenza. And other respiratory illness viruses, we don’t always know what they are. But I’ve never seen this reaction, and I’m trying to understand why.

[…]

I worry about the message to the public, about the fear of coming into contact with people, being in the same space as people, shaking their hands, having meetings with people. I worry about many, many consequences related to that.

[…]

In Hubei, in the province of Hubei, where there has been the most cases and deaths by far, the actual number of cases reported is 1 per 1000 people and the actual rate of deaths reported is 1 per 20,000. So maybe that would help to put things into perspective.

Dr John Ioannidis Professor of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy and of Biomedical Data Science, at Stanford University School of Medicine and a Professor of Statistics at Stanford University School of Humanities and Sciences. He is director of the Stanford Prevention Research Center, and co-director of the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS).

He is also the editor-in-chief of the European Journal of Clinical Investigation. He was chairman at the Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine as well as adjunct professor at Tufts University School of Medicine.

As a physician, scientist and author he has made contributions to evidence-based medicine, epidemiology, data science and clinical research. In addition, he pioneered the field of meta-research. He has shown that much of the published research does not meet good scientific standards of evidence.

What he says:

Patients who have been tested for SARS-CoV-2 are disproportionately those with severe symptoms and bad outcomes. As most health systems have limited testing capacity, selection bias may even worsen in the near future.

The one situation where an entire, closed population was tested was the Diamond Princess cruise ship and its quarantine passengers. The case fatality rate there was 1.0%, but this was a largely elderly population, in which the death rate from Covid-19 is much higher.

[…]

Could the Covid-19 case fatality rate be that low? No, some say, pointing to the high rate in elderly people. However, even some so-called mild or common-cold-type coronaviruses that have been known for decades can have case fatality rates as high as 8% when they infect elderly people in nursing homes.

[…]

If we had not known about a new virus out there, and had not checked individuals with PCR tests, the number of total deaths due to “influenza-like illness” would not seem unusual this year. At most, we might have casually noted that flu this season seems to be a bit worse than average.

– “A fiasco in the making? As the coronavirus pandemic takes hold, we are making decisions without reliable data”, Stat News, 17th March 2020

Dr Yoram Lass is an Israeli physician, politician and former Director General of the Health Ministry. He also worked as Associate Dean of the Tel Aviv University Medical School and during the 1980s presented the science-based television show Tatzpit.

What he says:

Italy is known for its enormous morbidity in respiratory problems, more than three times any other European country. In the US about 40,000 people die in a regular flu season and so far 40-50 people have died of the coronavirus, most of them in a nursing home in Kirkland, Washington.

[…]

In every country, more people die from regular flu compared with those who die from the coronavirus.

[…]

…there is a very good example that we all forget: the swine flu in 2009. That was a virus that reached the world from Mexico and until today there is no vaccination against it. But what? At that time there was no Facebook or there maybe was but it was still in its infancy. The coronavirus, in contrast, is a virus with public relations.

Whoever thinks that governments end viruses is wrong.

– Interview in Globes, March 22nd 2020

Dr Pietro Vernazza is a Swiss physician specialising Infectious Diseases at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen and Professor of Health Policy.

What he says:

We have reliable figures from Italy and a work by epidemiologists, which has been published in the renowned science journal ‹Science›, which examined the spread in China. This makes it clear that around 85 percent of all infections have occurred without anyone noticing the infection. 90 percent of the deceased patients are verifiably over 70 years old, 50 percent over 80 years.

[…]

In Italy, one in ten people diagnosed die, according to the findings of the Science publication, that is statistically one of every 1,000 people infected. Each individual case is tragic, but often – similar to the flu season – it affects people who are atthe end of their lives.
[…]
If we close the schools, we will prevent the children from quickly becoming immune.
[…]

We should better integrate the scientific facts into the political decisions.
– Interview in St. Galler Tagblatt, 22nd March 2020

Frank Ulrich Montgomery is German radiologist, former President of the German Medical Association and Deputy Chairman of the World Medical Association.

What he says:
I’m not a fan of lockdown. Anyone who imposes something like this must also say when and how to pick it up again. Since we have to assume that the virus will be with us for a long time, I wonder when we will return to normal? You can’t keep schools and daycare centers closed until the end of the year. Because it will take at least that long until we have a vaccine. Italy has imposed a lockdown and has the opposite effect. They quickly reached their capacity limits, but did not slow down the virus spread within the lockdown.

– Interview in General Anzeiger, 18th March 2020
Prof. Hendrik Streeck is a German HIV researcher, epidemiologist and clinical trialist. He is professor of virology, and the director of the Institute of Virology and HIV Research, at Bonn University.

What he says:

The new pathogen is not that dangerous, it is even less dangerous than Sars-1. The special thing is that Sars-CoV-2 replicates in the upper throat area and is therefore much more infectious because the virus jumps from throat to throat, so to speak. But that is also an advantage: Because Sars-1 replicates in the deep lungs, it is not so infectious, but it definitely gets on the lungs, which makes it more dangerous.
[…]

You also have to take into account that the Sars-CoV-2 deaths in Germany were exclusively old people. In Heinsberg, for example, a 78-year-old man with previous illnesses died of heart failure, and that without Sars-2 lung involvement. Since he was infected, he naturally appears in the Covid 19 statistics. But the question is whether he would not have died anyway, even without Sars-2.

– Interview in Frankfurter Allgemeine, 16th March 2020
Dr Yanis Roussel et. al. – A team of researchers from the Institut Hospitalo-universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille and the Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, conducting a peer-reviewed study on Coronavirus mortality for the government of France under the ‘Investments for the Future’ programme.

What they say:

The problem of SARS-CoV-2 is probably overestimated, as 2.6 million people die of respiratory infections each year compared with less than 4000 deaths for SARS-CoV-2 at the time of writing.

[…]
This study compared the mortality rate of SARS-CoV-2 in OECD countries (1.3%) with the mortality rate of common coronaviruses identified in AP-HM patients (0.8%) from 1 January 2013 to 2 March 2020. Chi-squared test was performed, and the P-value was 0.11 (not significant).

[…]

…it should be noted that systematic studies of other coronaviruses (but not yet for SARS-CoV-2) have found that the percentage of asymptomatic carriers is equal to or even higher than the percentage of symptomatic patients. The same data for SARS-CoV-2 may soon be available, which will further reduce the relative risk associated with this specific pathology.

– “SARS-CoV-2: fear versus data”, International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 19th March 2020
Dr. David Katz is an American physician and founding director of the Yale University Prevention Research Center

What he says:

I am deeply concerned that the social, economic and public health consequences of this near-total meltdown of normal life — schools and businesses closed, gatherings banned — will be long-lasting and calamitous, possibly graver than the direct toll of the virus itself. The stock market will bounce back in time, but many businesses never will. The unemployment, impoverishment and despair likely to result will be public health scourges of the first order.

– “Is Our Fight Against Coronavirus Worse Than the Disease?”, New York Times 20th March 2020

Michael T. Osterholm is regents professor and director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota.
says:

Consider the effect of shutting down offices, schools, transportation systems, restaurants, hotels, stores, theaters, concert halls, sporting events and other venues indefinitely and leaving all of their workers unemployed and on the public dole. The likely result would be not just a depression but a complete economic breakdown, with countless permanently lost jobs, long before a vaccine is ready or natural immunity takes hold.

[…]

[T]he best alternative will probably entail letting those at low risk for serious disease continue to work, keep business and manufacturing operating, and “run” society, while at the same time advising higher-risk individuals to protect themselves through physical distancing and ramping up our health-care capacity as aggressively as possible. With this battle plan, we could gradually build up immunity without destroying the financial structure on which our lives are based.