COVID-19 TREATMENT FRAUD
June 30, 2020
According to the plan for a COVID vaccine, everything is going just fine. Whatever the CDC and NIAID come up with will be given and it will be a mandatory vaccine. The fear factor has been successfully installed by sensationalizing the spread of the virus even if its mortality and morbidity has dramatically decreased.
Dr. Fauci, head of the White House Coronavirus Task Force that produced the initial guidance on the management of the outbreak in the US is now sensationalizing the rising rate of the spread of the virus in states that have relaxed their recommended restrictions. Even though the rate of infection no longer correlates with the death rate or even the rate of serious disease, he is still calling for more stringent measures to contain the virus fully, totally ignoring the economic impact for the whole of the country in his exhortations. This is one huge effort to fraudulently maximize the public demand for his vaccine that is currently in phase 3 trials, which entails the testing of the vaccine on patients for effectiveness. It also maximizes the public demand for his chosen first line drug for COVID 19, Remdesivir. Its actual performance is guaranteed not to diminish the demand for the vaccine. This is the same doctor who collaborated with a researcher Dr. Gallo who claimed to have discovered the AIDS virus. Having designed a test which produces a large incidence of false positives because the test doesn’t actually detect the virus. Managing a budget of millions of taxpayer dollars, and in addition, being funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Clinton Foundation, Dr. Fauci gave the pharma company Gilead millions of dollars to produce a severely corrosive drug, AZT for HIV/AIDS prevention to those who merely had risk factors for AIDS. The FDA approved the drug despite it having failed 2 of 4 drug trials. Dr. Fauci, in his 37 years in the NIAID arm of the NIH, he was unable to come up with a vaccine for the AIDS virus. Now, with a great big opportunity to produce another vaccine, he is once again giving Gilead millions of dollars to produce Remdesivir, another risky drug trialed on Ebola, which to date only decreases the duration of COVID illness by an average of 3-4 days. It has not yet even been shown to improve survival of the disease. This, in complete ignorance of the much cheaper, more widely available anti-malarial drug HCQ which is far more effective in deterring the severity of the disease itself. This fits Dr. Fauci’s plan for drumming up desire for a vaccine for COVID. He is actually attempting to coerce the country to shut down its economy just for the purpose of having the general population require the vaccine. In leading the smear for HCQ, Dr. Fauci has fraudulently produced a perceived threat of a virus that now produces fairly mild symptoms, if any at all, in the vast majority of healthy, productive adults.
Meanwhile, in the country that is the main supplier of HCQ, India, the death rate from COVID 19 is the lowest by far , 1 per million, as compared to the average western countries, 50 per million. A whopping 80% of healthcare workers given HCQ as a prophylactic don’t get infected. It also greatly reduces the mortality rate upon being used therapeutically.
Dr. Fauci speaks as if this is a doomsday scenario because the shear number of infections have sharply risen. This is to imply that there will be more deaths and severely ill people than we would have if everyone continued the lockdown and complied with all his recommended restrictions. There is no explanation about why the death rate and hospitalization rate for COVID have continued to decline in those same areas. He actually believes that if he and the democrat governors and mayors and the media continue to focus on the rising infections, he can contain the virus so that there will actually be a public demand for his vaccine, while Remdesivir continues to be sold at $2340 per person. The US government has invested $3 billion on 6 companies to develop a vaccine and 3 companies to manufacture it. The US National Stockpile now has 63 million doses of HCQ that is not allowed to be used as in the successful trials in New York.
Dr. Fauci is committing this fraud in total collaboration with the CDC and the World Health Organization in order to achieve a global healthcare system that will impose its remedies on the entire world all at the same time in an insane effort to spread the cost of healthcare evenly around the world.
June 23, 2020
What a stark difference between the way the two medias depict the current progression of COVID 19! The liberal media portrays it as a worsening progression due to people being too lax about social distancing and wearing masks. They insinuate that the overall increases in cases is a threat to the larger community and our economy without claiming any logical basis. They immediately focus on President Trump’s rally while having stayed completely silent about the risk of spread engendered by the protests. Dr. Tom Inglesby from Johns Hopkins makes a large distinction between large indoor gatherings vs large outdoor gatherings, implying that the President’s rally was much more risky than the protests. They refute the president’s claim that the coronavirus is fading away, stating that there are increases of cases around the world and concur with the WHO that states that this is a serious matter of concern. They make a concerted effort to mislead the country about the fact that the president was referring to the virus causing milder symptoms, especially amongst the younger community, as stated by other health professionals around the world. They accentuate the importance of waiting until there is a vaccine available which they admit will most likely not be until next year. They also emphasize the importance of contact tracing and quarantining. They present this without considering the impact on our economy and its consequences.
The conservative media focuses on the overall death rate of the US dropping by 40% in the last 2 weeks, attributing it to social distancing and adherence to wearing masks. This media does emphasize the importance of distinguishing both hospitalization rates and death rates. The waning of the severity of the disease is attributed to possible mutations of the virus and a lower viral load. They emphasize the importance of cautious re-opening, warning of the resurgence of the virus if not done carefully enough. The increase in cases amongst the younger population is attributed to the successful protection of the older population and increased testing. One expert emphasized the need to be vigilant about the hospital bed capacity.
Interestingly enough, after HCQ being re-instated by the WHO as a legitimate trial drug to be available to symptomatic patients, it has completely vanished from the media. There is no formal study as to how many people benefited from HCQ with zinc, and how many could have benefited from it. There is no discussion about how this regimen could be the key to saving our remaining vulnerable population. Frustratingly, what is also being completely disregarded is the hospitalization rate of people under 55 due to COVID 19 specifically. The importance of the mildness of symptoms among our young people is also under-appreciated. These two factors should be used to emphasize the importance of facilitating herd immunity among them. There is one expert that discussed this but in a very confusing manner. What is being completely avoided is any discussion about the viral concentration and the fact that it is most likely decreasing significantly amongst everyone overall globally. Too much focus on that could lead to a public inquiry about how an artificially high concentration of this virus could have caused the unusually high severity and death rate in the first 4-6 weeks, curiously followed by such a significant decrease in overall death and severity globally. If it can be shown that the both the severity of the illness and the threat to the larger community is fading, then it threatens the importance of inoculating the larger community. The liberal media is doing everything to fear-monger everyone to slow or totally avoid the spread of the virus in order to uphold the value of the development of the vaccine! There is this concerted effort by those directly connected to the CDC to depict a dire need for a vaccine. How is it that the president has it right again despite the outrageous disinformation campaign led by the CDC and the liberal media? How is it there is no differentiation between those ICU beds being taken by the prison and nursing home population as opposed to those from the larger community? These are very important pieces of the logical argument for lifting or prolonging local lockdowns.
June 4, 2020
Wouldn’t you know, the LANCET just retracted their study of the huge multinational trial led by the WHO involving HCQ after it had been investigated for unsupported statistical information, blamed on the hospitals providing the information to a third party medical statistics organization. The WHO had halted the trial based on their study. As a result, the WHO had no recourse but to resume the trial. Had the study not been discovered to be faulty, this huge trial would have been halted with the worldwide conclusion that HCQ is useless and dangerous for treatment of COVID 19.
May 25,2020
President Trump disclosed today that he is taking hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic to Covid-19 with the approval of his physician, who stated that “After numerous discussions he and I had about regarding the evidence for and against the use of hydroxychloroquine, we concluded the potential benefit from treatment outweighed the relative risks”. Is this a logical action to take for the president of the United States? Well, in review of all the evidence that I have come across in the last 3 months, the answer is a definitive yes!
In as early as mid February 2020, there was evidence that hydroxychloroquine in combination with zinc was making a dramatic difference in South Korea. Then, March 21st, Israel’s pharmaceutical company Teva donated 6 million doses of hydroxychloroquine to the US. that was to be distributed to hospitals.
There is a huge coordinated smear campaign against hydroxychloroquine which is being propagated by the NIH (National Institutes of Health) for the purpose of preserving the value for mass vaccination against COVID-19. If there actually was an effective treatment for COVID-19 or any coronavirus, there would be little purpose in vaccinating the entire population. There may still be value for vaccinating the immunocompromised and the elderly. This would certainly and substantially diminish the profit that pharmaceutical companies have made on Remdesivir or any other antivirals. More impactfully, it would deny government agencies around the world the opportunity to enforce the behavioral compliance to be vaccinated “for the greater good”. Well, hydroxychloroquine is now proving to be that threat to government agencies and big pharmaceutical companies. The proof is definitely now being made.
Basic science research has shown us that HCQ facilitates a greater amount of zinc to enter the cells and prevent the coronavirus from replicating itself inside the cell.
There have been several overwhelmingly successful HCQ trials in the US, in South Korea, France and Belgium. Dr. Vladimir Zalenko, a community physician in Kyrias Joel, NY, a Hassidic Jewish community hard hit with COVID-19, combined all the evidence thus far produced in South Korea and France and treated 405 patients in the high risk category for COVID-19 since beginning of March with nearly 100% effectiveness. He accomplished this by combining HCQ with Azithromycin and Zinc. A study out of NYU Grossman School of Medicine on 900 patients found that as half of the patients were given zinc in addition to HCQ and Azithromycin had a 1.5 times greater chance of recovery to discharge and 44% less likely to die. On April 10th, a French study of 1,061 patients resulted in 91.7% virologic cure while 10 patients were transferred to ICU and 5 patients, from age 74-95, died. There was no evidence of cardiac toxicity. Dr. Grace at Lennox Hill hospital claimed on national media that he is treating over 100 patients with HCQ and that none have died.
Both the media and our federal health agencies are blatantly ignoring these studies to proclaim HCQ ineffective and dangerous. The report done by Elizabeth Cohen, medical correspondent for CNN…has been touting the failures of HCQ and the fact that the Lancet study of May 22nd showed that HCQ was ineffective and dangerous, producing cardiac arrhythmias. She did not mention that it was given to patients with heart disease in a late phase of the COVID infection, not to patients who were just turning symptomatic where it had already been proven to be effective.
So why is there a concerted smear campaign against HCQ on the part of the liberal media and the CDC and NIH? How does a relatively inexpensive drug like HCQ threaten these people? It is not merely Trump Derangement Syndrome. Even if president Trump were not to have promoted HCQ there would still be an all out war against it.
The COVID pandemic is too large an opportunity for the CDC to miss out on for the purpose of retaining ownership and control of its “cure”, not just in the US but globally. It legitimizes behavioral control of large populations while also gaining access and taking part in the distribution of individual’s private health information. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, it is comprised of people very much sympathetic to the civil rights movement. Today in healthcare, this for them means achieving an equal distribution of healthcare equity. It assumes that the “privileged” sector of society will always be favored by the owners and providers of healthcare. Their organizational structure prioritizes the distribution of healthcare equity as one of their main offices is the Office of Minority Health and Health Equity. The CDC originated from an initial private organization funded by the Rockefeller foundation, dedicated to preventing, yes, malaria in the US, particularly in the south. The CDC is quite versed in occurrence of side effects of hydroxychloroquine at therapeutic doses. It had been on the FDA’s list of safe and effective drugs since the 1960s.. They have dropped it from this list only upon the occurrence of COVID-19. The CDC has since ballooned into a huge multinational organization that has declared control over the the prevention of all communicable diseases, along with gun control. They, along with the federal regulatory agencies of healthcare have systematically overhauled the provision of healthcare so as to be able to monitor, in real time, and control the distribution of treatment and medication down to the minute of professional attention and the mg of each medicine administered anywhere and everywhere in the US and many other countries. For these reasons its size and power is largely supported by the liberal democratic politicians and the largest pharmaceutical industry leaders. The largest pharmaceutical companies compete for CDC led vaccine development contracts and for FDA approval of new drugs. They are among the heaviest lobbyers of the democratic arm of congress.
Just as the CDC could not tolerate the discovery of an effective cure to the coronavirus, neither could the large pharmaceutical companies stand to lose out on an immense source of lobbying capital, and neither could the democratic party stand to lose that large an opportunity for financial support. Therefore, on behalf of the CDC and the NIH, the large pharmaceutical companies, and the democrats in congress, there must not be a legitimate alternative to expensive, less effective drugs, nor a vaccine to manage this pandemic. An already widely distributed cheap medication like HCQ would crash this party way too hard! No, this would be another serious obstacle to the ultimate goal of global control of healthcare equity by an international CDC and other international organizations such as the WHO. So there lies the desperate attempt and mad rush to discredit HCQ by implementing large trials that are designed to make it appear ineffective. All these trials are administering HCQ without its essential primary agent, zinc and aimed at patients who by enlarge have already suffered an irreversible destruction of lung tissue and other organ function. They are administering their own drugs to those who show much more promise of survival. Even as Remdesivir, a much more expensive and less experienced drug has been shown to be minimally effective, it has been declared the more likely frontline treatment for COVID-19. Just in the last few days, three federal agencies started a trial of just 19 patients using a cancer drug approved to treat blood cancers. The trial is aimed at patients who have developed serious symptoms requiring hospitalization. It has already been shown that these patients would more likely benefit from HCQ/zinc/Azythromycin at a fraction of the cost of this new cancer drug. This is a blatant, unprecedented and concerted campaign to depreciate HCQ. All this while the HCQ trials that include zinc are being run by doctors who have no ability to enlist a large patient cohort. Yet in any other setting, their results would prompt a credible and definitive study that would be stopped as soon as it replicated the doctor’s results, upon which HCQ/zinc/Azythromycin would be declared as the frontline treatment for COVID-19 with the exception of progressed heart disease or end stage respiratory and multi-organ failure. This could have saved the lives of thousands of patients by now. It could also be declared as the frontline prophylactic in the setting of future local epidemics.
The vaccine, by the time it became widely available to the public, would be largely outdated. By early next year, the only individuals that would benefit are those that would not yet have been exposed and are susceptible to developing a serious respiratory illness. Granted, the vaccine would be a great value for them at that time. The next generation of elderly such as myself would already have been exposed and therefore not be threatened with a serious illness. This eventuality would seriously hamper the CDC’s aspirations of distributing the vaccine among the larger population. On the other hand, if a significant portion of the larger population remains unexposed, then they remain a threat to the vulnerable sector of society and thus could be obligated to be vaccinated by law. This, I believe, is the ultimate real goal of the CDC and WHO. It is the only condition that would maintain the value of the impending vaccine.
Popular support for the vaccine is also essential. Without sufficient fear of being unprotected from a formidable health threat, it would be too difficult to find enough people willing to take a risk and participate in the safety trials early on as in mid March 2020. The only way for the public to be willing to take such a risk would be in the context of an uncontrolled spread, causing serious illness and death. In early February, the WHO was proclaiming that there was no scientific evidence to support banning international travel. So, many passengers arrived from China before the travel ban was imposed by president Trump, and before there was enough effective screening at our international airports. These were the unnecessary and illogical acts of omission by the CDC and WHO that produced the worldwide need and value for a vaccine.
Now, the priority for these organizations is the prevention of herd immunity. Now that we have flattened the curve and shown that there are enough medical resources to treat the remaining future symptomatic cases of COVID, we are experiencing the political response of persistently imposing nondiscretionary, all encompassing statewide lockdowns along political lines at a huge cost to the future taxpayers of the country, not to mention threatening their future local economies. This, all supported by the CDC with the intention of having an unexposed population to vaccinate. This would also create a recurring population that would be need to be vaccinated on some recurrent basis.