Deterrence-the essence of diplomatic stability
In the real world of evil threats and intentions, the most civilized way of preventing catastrophic conflict amongst sovereign nations has been by way of deterrence. The Miriam Webster definition of deterrence is :
the act or process of deterring: such as
a: the inhibition of criminal behavior by fear especially of punishment
b: the maintenance of military power for the purpose of discouraging attack// nuclear deterrence
The argument for deterrence is that while it presents a logical reality to our enemies that the risk and cost of aggression is much too high for them, it also provides security for the nation that it will always be prepared to defend and protect its own citizens. Remaining aware of the enemy’s capabilities compels our defense and intelligence institutions to proactively design formidable technologies that promise the development of new military defense strategies.
It is normal to de-prioritize or abandon certain defense strategies when the threat is no longer perceived. Obviously, it is not normal to do so while those specific threats remain or are increasing. The only logical reason to do so would be upon a change in perception, that those same threats and capabilities to inflict harm to the citizens of a sovereign nation are no longer perceived as threats. In this paradigm, the government would have to perceive all those who refuse to abandon the old paradigm as the main threat. This is exactly what our secretary of state Antony Blinken admitted, by calling out nationalist extremism as the nation’s main threat to national security. In the beginning of Antony Blinken’s period in office, most people outside of the administration realized who he is. Now, we realize that by design, this man stepped into the formidable office of secretary of state and performed a complete 180 as to who the nation’s enemies are and what the threats are. It turns out that who he means by national extremists is any citizen who would speak out against the total redirection of the entire country. The old enemies, the terrorist subsidizing nations, the totalitarian aggressors, and the drug and sex trafficking cartels are no longer threats. The new enemies are US citizens who still regard these old enemies as real threats. The new “nationalist extremists” are anyone who would speak out against the policies of this administration in public, i.e. parents at a public school board meeting! This is the tactic that this type of man will use to silence and intimidate his political opposition. Normally up to now, any such character would be fired. The real cause for alarm here is that he is well supported by this administration, which in turn is well supported by large international organizations owned by the billionaires that are out to squash the values legally protected by our Constitution. These are the people who are systematically dismantling the deterrent forces of the United States. In a state of war, the entire administration could be legally prosecuted for absolute treason. Absent the state of war, there would have to be enough public support to prosecute them for aiding and abetting the nation’s enemies in plotting to or producing harm against the citizens of this country. Harm would have to be distinctively defined in all its facets. The harm is that their national economy is actively being destroyed, their discretionary income being stripped away, their individual freedoms are being systematically limited and restricted by a scheme of deception, promising a lifetime of safety, security, and prosperity, something that has been proven throughout history, and now in the present times, to be impossible to deliver.
Deterrence is the natural human response to perceived threats to not just survival, but also to culture and community. We humans know that it is natural as we observe the design of each type of creature to have been given some form of instinctual and biological deterrence from outward aggression. Well, in Blinken’s world, its time for the porcupine to lose its quills, the skunk to lose its odor, and the snake to lose its venom. Any animal that disagrees with allowing the New Provider for their very survival is now their new enemy. In Blinken’s world, all the animals must progress into a cooperative, symbiotic community. In the Biden administration’s world, the communist regimes which have been threatening to harm and conquer the United States are not the enemy all of a sudden. the “gaffe” that our vice president made at the Korean demilitarized zone was not really a gaffe, as we now see the lack of interest in walking it back. This was just a sneak preview for the rest of the world to reveal their response. This administration is to be purely driven by public opinion ( liberal left). All those that disagree with the radical imposition of micromanaged governmental control of every aspect of the private individual’s life and stealing from his paycheck to pay for all that control, are the new enemy. So, the first thing that needs to be done is to give them a label that allows the government to be weaponized against them. This is a brazen attempt to install a communist government in the guise of democracy. According to this puppet regime, the United States must now allow Communism to once again, spread further throughout the world and, yes to be indoctrinated into our younger generation. It must allow totalitarianism to become a government form of coercion and control of its own people and their behaviors and expressions. It must allow for self imposed economic implosion and energy dependence on enemy producers of oil for the sake of producing an artificial demand for alternative forms of energy which are more expensive to produce. We will be paying for the new electric infrastructure for public transit, for the miles and miles of ocean based wind turbines, and for the acres and acres of solar panels, all to be installed by the illegal migrants that continue to cross the border. We will be paying not only their salaries, but all the social services their families will require, including public schooling. We are in the process of literally giving up half our paychecks to sabotage the values of the US Constitution for the convenience of the few elite who seek to inherit control of our economy and of our governance.
All deterrents from threats to our national sovereignty are being actively dismantled! We are no longer maintaining our military readiness, our economic strength and resilience, nor our national will to protect and defend our sovereignty. We are not deterring physical invasion, nor economic implosion, nor military invasion, nor technological conquest at this point. We are quickly making ourselves the easiest industrialized country to conquer by any of our rogue enemy states or terrorist groups! The first deterrent to mass intrusion is the manner in which we observe our immigration law. After demonstrating our willingness to ignore our current law, we demonstrate our willingness to provide easy passage to those who intend to do great harm to our own citizens by way of Fentanyl, to those who are doing great harm to the migrants themselves through rape, assault and sex trafficking. The second deterrent the US has to mass intrusion is the manner in which we enforce our immigration law. Our Federal government refusing to coordinate with ICE, risking all kinds of harm to our own citizens, giving the cartels the ultimate green light to send over their very worst. The third way we deter mass intrusion is by how we support the soldiers implementing the deterrence. Yet as we are being invaded by mass intrusion, this government refuses to close the border, or to fortify the front line soldiers, the Border Patrol.
Deterrence from military provocation has been systematically being dismantled for years starting with Obama, as he stated in 2010 that the US would reduce its nuclear arsenal unilaterally as he was seeking a perfect world of zero nuclear weapons. Obama hated the fact that the US was seen as a major protector and defender of democracy around the world. Dismantling this deterrent signaled a major change in how the US was perceived around the world. He sabotaged the strength and resolve of our soldiers by lowering the physical requirements so as to include women in combat, and by lowering the spiritual source of motivational strength as they are harassed for showing any evidence of their Christian faith, even within their personal space. Soldiers are being harassed if they outwardly display or share their deepest spiritual beliefs. The best of our military are being disqualified and dismissed from the military if they have religious beliefs and very real, logical arguments against the COVID vaccine.
Make no mistake! Although these parasites are billionaires, they do not believe in the value of the free market in determining the producers of wealth. In their eyes, their success is due to their unusual ingenuity, not the existence of the free market. This is merely what the Western world has created that only results in more economic despotism and war, and by determining the losers, poverty. No, as Klaus Schwab put it, you, in this room,meaning the attendees of the World Economic Forum are the ones who will fix these world problems. How does Schwab think they will solve the world’s problems? By inventing new materials and technologies perhaps, by incentivizing private industry to do more R&D perhaps? No Way!! To give up that much control of the real intended outcome would be catastrophic for them. For the free market to come up with ultimate solutions in this way would absolutely shatter their New World Order! Their goal is not the process, but the economic outcome, a controlled world economy where everything is nominally valued, where processes are installed in order to control prices of all goods. Instead of the relative value of things according to supply and demand, it will be the manipulation of supply and demand by international authorities and assigned prices that will determine ultimate targeted demand for goods. Since the free market, i.e. the people aren’t smart enough to demand “the right products”, a handful of globalists will determine the ultimate value of things through international trade organizations. Trade arbitration will be managed by third party globalists all under authority of the UN. The real goal: re-distribution of wealth between the nations
So what is happening now is totally unprecedented in the history of this country. We have capitulated to outside organizations in limiting our military and our military involvement even when faced with the threat of communist expansion across Europe! The fox is about to get a hold of all the hen house secrets that are used to guard it against the fox’s friends. The Obama puppets are desperate to get a hold of those secrets in order to negotiate them away for diplomatic favors from our enemy communist leaders that further the cause of the globalists and strip the US of the ability to support our intelligence agents against our these adversaries. We will no longer be able to stay a step ahead of their evil intentions as they support the worst terrorist organizations in evolving their technology and capabilities. Our agents who worked on behalf of the Trump administration will be outed, decommissioned, and killed. These are the motives that produce FBI raids like the Mar A Lago raid. The nature of the raid and what was searched reveals the politicization of that once highly trusted intelligence agency.
This administration is describing our new geopolitical position as interdependent. It is actually interdependent by choice, by the choice of a small number of globalist despots that seek to control the international distribution of wealth. Yes, globalism as a phenomenon of technological progress in communication, transportation, and financial transactions brings even our adversaries to our front door, but the proactive depreciation of genuine sovereignty by enticing open borders, by unilaterally limiting our nuclear capacity for deterrence, by thwarting our energy independence and economic progress, the production of the country’s wealth, slowing the progress of our military, weakening the genuine patriotic resolve of our forces, this tiny group is on track to place the United States into the most dangerous position we’ve ever had in the world. This not only makes us nervous, but in an unspoken way, our allies also. This administration is forcing the United States to become a cooperative interdependent, committed to the socialist standards and values of the United Nations. This kind of global interdependence was first described by Karl Marx. It is hard to imagine the security of our country truly dependent on other countries, as we would no longer be able to afford to maintain a strong enough military to defend our selves! This is being done to us intentionally. No country in the history of the world has ever even considered imposing this kind of economic and military suicide upon itself! The United States as the author of individual freedom, and as a result, the single most deterrent against the spread of communism is no longer that deterrent. It only takes a moment to embolden our communist dictators once we decisively let our guard down. Putin, Chi, and Jon-Un have been waiting for a very long time for this moment. Who in their right mind could think they would pass it up. These emboldenments were and are totally predictable on any diplomatic level. Their most brazen military threats are now on full display for the world to see the results of the United States relinquishing power.
Yes, the world is by default economically interdependent by the distribution of the capacity to produce food, to manufacture goods and process natural resources. Engaging in trade that enables each country to strengthen their industries and economic output is a favorable goal that promotes more peace and security around the world than anything else. The ONLY way for sovereign countries to achieve this is by way of the free market in a competitive interdependence, promoting private innovation, industry and economic progress, thereby increasing the world’s wealth, and the overall standard of living in the world. No group of human beings is logically able to come up with an original idea and innovation. Only an individual can do this and contribute to the group. Individuals are best motivated by individual goals and aspirations. Whatever value is contributed to the world must be validated by the world itself, not a state with its own agenda, unless the state’s agenda is merely to incentivize the free market. By disenfranchising the individual, giving him or her a role that depreciates their unique talents, strengths and passions, these socialist globalists believe that the individual will eventually acquiesce to becoming a subject, enslaved in the state’s agenda. Only a small group of privileged individuals should be able to contribute this way and get full credit. That way, only the approved innovations will be officially sanctioned, and only in that specific way that they, the globalists, choose. Prescribing products and limiting choice will stifle the free market and cause the citizenry to lose their discretionary income, stifling the individual, stifling innovation, and therefore the accumulation of wealth around the world. NO MORE GENUINE INNOVATORS AND PRIVATE WEALTH, just those chosen to have the jobs of innovation according to their loyalty to a stifling system, constantly consuming the world’s wealth. This will lead to world-wide famine and disease as the bible promises us. Those given charge to simplistically save the planet are headed towards creating the world’s greatest impoverishment ever seen!
A word about private wealth that is created by legal profit. This private wealth is the God-given most potent and natural motivator of innovation. This is money that results after building a sustaining and free workforce. Any workforce that can work in the same capacity for greater compensation and/or benefits in another firm will cost that company in terms of productivity and value. Therefore a company that abuses its profit by neglecting its workforce becomes less and less competitive. That is exactly why so many people received immediate monetary compensation from their employer as their business tax rates were reduced during the Trump administration. Prior to COVID, every sector of the workforce experienced a significant bump in compensation one way or another. The private workforce is, in general, paid by corporate income, which results from the discretionary income of their customer base in exchange for something of value to the same degree. This same exchange is the source of profit that grows the company and increases its ability to generate more profit by expanding and innovating. This, then grows the discretionary income of the private workforce, the individual.
The public workforce is paid by funds taken from the private and public sector, limiting everyone’s discretionary income. Remember, discretionary income is the only true source of the production of more wealth. Wealth is constantly being produced in terms of profit, or consumed in terms of limiting discretionary income. If the result of raising taxes was to more effectively increase discretionary income as opposed to limiting it, the socialist and communist countries in the world would be greatest source of private wealth. Reality shows us that government is not the best motivator of innovation. This is for two main reasons. Since it does not engage in the free market, the extra money that is extracted in the form of taxes does not come from innovation and increased market demand for their services. It comes from an imposed demand that limits discretionary income. It cannot reward individuals for innovations that create more profit. It can only spend the extra money on increasing the compensation of chosen individuals in whatever distribution the authorities prefer and in increasing the size of the public workforce, limiting future discretionary income. Only those that are naive to these distinctions between private and public compensation could be fooled with the favorable increase in the job’s report due to government employment. Secondly, the government doesn’t have to earn the money it spends. It has been regularly printing money up front, depreciating the dollar and causing runaway inflation and increased borrowing costs, further shrinking the household discretionary income.
The socialist countries in Europe that our liberal globalists boast about have all been in a serious trajectory of impoverishment, giving up genuine sovereignty to the European Union for decades. Now, the European Union can’t seem to afford to bail out their members any longer, the German Bank having reached its limit. What’s happening? In the absence of war, famine, or a drastic disparity in the distribution of wealth as in the US, they are becoming more and more impoverished, more dependent on other countries for economic support, military support, and national security.
With Obama having blocked the production of the XL pipeline in 2015 as he declared it would compromise his leadership in the climate change movement, fracking not yet up to speed in 2015, the European countries having to consider making an agreement with Russia for cheaper oil, losing hope for importing from the US, they were well on their way to a serious dependence on Russia throughout the Obama administration. Trump was in favor of the pipeline but wanted a new contract on better terms, for it to be built with US steel. A federal judge halted any progress of the pipeline pending more environmental impact studies. Then, at a time when Europe was becoming desperate enough to engage with Russia for a more direct pipeline, Biden upon first day in office, revokes TC Energy’s permit to build it. The result has become disastrous, with Russia halting oil exports to Europe and Europe having no alternative to reasonably priced oil. This alone will severely challenge the impoverishing European economy even further. Only because it has not become politically nor economically expedient for Biden to halt fracking, has Europe had the benefit of the tremendous volume of oil fracking produces. Fracking is the reason we have become a net exporter of oil just recently. But, keep in mind we export just a little more than we import, meaning that if we had to defend a NATO country from Russia, we would most likely lose our export status and become even more dependent on Venezuela and Saudi Arabia. Venezuela might even cut us off. Putin is fully aware of our real oil vulnerability. The XL Pipeline was to be the insurance plan against the United States remaining dependent on Russian, Venezuelan, and Suadi oil. That’s the real reason this pipeline was extinguished on Biden’s first day in office. That would have totally quagmired the globalist plan for cooperative economic interdependence! OPEC now having decreased their output significantly will raise the price of gas at the pump even further.
Had the XL Pipeline been operational, Europe would not have had to depend on Russia for so much of its oil needs, the price of gas at the pump would have remained low, avoiding this ridiculously unnecessary period of inflation. Additionally, Biden would not have had to beg for the Saudis to increase production to lower the highest gas prices ever. Russia would not be able to punish Europe so severely. The global elites know this very well. They have an ulterior motive that justifies these “necessary sacrifices”.
Diplomatic Cooperative Interdependence to erode national sovereignty
In 2012, as soon as Obama announced to the world that the United States was going to begin to disarm unilaterally, we were on our way to complying with a UN driven program of international interdependence on a diplomatic level. As the United States made concessions to Iran, giving it a green light to develop their nuclear program for military use, all the while supplying major terrorist groups with guns and ammunition, it required no great diplomatic acumen to figure out that John Kerry was not speaking for the US, but for the globalist movement which is desperate to create nuclear parity between the East and the West. It is also important to note that our adversaries including Iran are desperately seeking nuclear parity with the US. The globalist agenda for international diplomatic parity cannot be dismissed too soon. This explains the entire Obama and Biden administration’s “shortcomings” as each diplomatic exchange was for the purpose of demonstrating the chosen weak diplomatic route of the United States to the world. The most recent being the tragic disassociation from Afghanistan, giving the Taliban the green light to take over the entire country. This administration has made repeated diplomatic concessions to enemies of our Constitution, but cannot be considered legally treasonous as we are not currently at war conventionally. All this is to give our country no choice but to give up our individual freedoms to the self imposed authority of the UN. The diplomatic interdependence of the world powers will give the UN their long sought authority to force the entire free world into a socialist cooperative. In fact Obama is still mediating this transformation between the UN and the US. He tends to show up any time Biden is in a position of authorizing some major diplomatic initiative.
The reality of the history of socialism and the failing socialist states of the present age does not deter these despots. Their rhetoric is that a world socialist system is the only way to their perfect world. Since the beginning of the UN in 1948, there have been theorizers promoting this idea through the decades. They admit that the earliest known mention of this idea is in the Karl Marx literature. Their big plan known as Agenda 2030 is to realize just this arrangement. This is a huge process of creating international cooperative interdependence on every level, compromising the industrial nations’ national sovereignty, national security, and national economies. It would become immoral for a country to negotiate trade or conduct diplomacy for its own best interests. The adversaries of the West would gain economic and diplomatic leverage to demonize and eventually criminalize the capitalist system of economic competition. The United States would be forced to dismantle the capitalist economic system, criminalizing proponents of free enterprise, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. The individual would be forced to endorse every religion except the Christian religion which serves as the basis for our Constitutional individual freedoms today. Most young people take for granted all the sacrifices of individuals throughout the history of the country to make their free lifestyle possible. They have no emotional response to the flag, the national anthem, nor the accounts of these specific sacrifices. It’s as if their freedom is overburdening and confusing. Only when the major life decisions of what values to stand for, what major in college to study, what vocation to follow, where and in what capacity to work, and what economic goals to shoot for, are irreversibly taken away will they realize what happened. Then it will be too late. They will have no voice and no support. There will be an epidemic of psychological depression the US has never before seen.
The process of creating this world catastrophe has been theorized and prescribed profusely in United Nations circles. The authors credited are mostly American! The officers implementing these organizational transformations are African and European. Generally, according to the UN publication, Agenda 2030, the process starts with interconnected international state sponsored organizations working through non-state international organizations better known as NGOs. These organizations are supported and incentivized by what they call “non-state individual actors” which are presumed to be international and national “elites”, or billionaires, e.g. Soros, Gates, Buffet, etc.. Also, in this category, are included former heads of state and state office holders like Obama, Kerry, and Gore. Their three fold method of achieving the cooperation of sovereign countries is to create economic and diplomatic interdependence and to influence public opinion. The UN’s role is to help and support the organizational changes in local communities of each country. The way this is accomplished in third world countries is through the IMF, governmental and social cooperation in exchange for economic support. The method it is utilizing in the US is to influence local elections to the city councils and county boards of commissioners. This is what supports the defunding of police, and the radicalization of public schools.
The United States Socialist Party website, during Obama’s first term, described in detail how 400 US scholars were sent to the United Nations to teach about this socialist transformation of the entire world and how children might be taught the new values, demonizing the capitalist system as a pure function of greed. One such scholar, James B. Duke professor of political science at Duke University, Robert Keohane is cited in the UN document Agenda 2030 as a principal author that introduced the concept of cooperative global interdependence in 1977 in the article Power and Interdependence. In 2003, in reference to the Iraq war, he wrote an article recommending that each country, including the US enter into an agreement of cooperative diplomatic interdependence authorized and mediated by the UN Security Council. He suggested transforming the UN Security Council into an authority over when, where, and for what reasons a country could wage war, and to what degree, granting the UN the responsibility of giving the invaded country post war military and economic support. By that method, the US could never be a military threat against any Middle Eastern country by virtue of the veto process the UN Security Council is governed by. Iran and Syria could overtake the entire Middle East overnight and threaten the world with severe economic depression by being able to block a major proportion of the world’s flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz. Robert’s wife, Nannerl, is also a liberal political theorist and educator that achieved lofty heights in American academia, from teaching at Stanford, Swathmore, and U Penn to President of Duke University to visiting professorships here in the US and in Berlin, Germany. Nannerl also collected several of the highest academic awards in her teaching career and was inducted into the Women’s Hall of Fame for her support and authorship on women’s leadership. Robert’s son, Nathaniel served as Special Assistant to the President Obama for Energy and Environment in the National Economic Council and Domestic Policy Council as an environmental economist where he helped develop energy and administration policy on energy and environmental issues. Prior to that, he was vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund, where he helped enact comprehensive cap and trade legislation in Congress. He also received degrees in the most prominent ivy league schools in the country. The Keohane family is a quintessential example of Obama-directed academic global elites which are leading the charge in indoctrinating our college students and influencing the UN in how to create global cooperative interdependence, first for the sake of climate change, but ultimately for the sake of income inequality. For environmentalists and liberal economists, the free market is the problem, not the answer. The result of government mandated pollution control standards was to drive the largest employers overseas where they could afford to continue to process natural resources for lower taxes, less regulation, and cheaper labor. This left the US with rising welfare costs, high unemployment and a falling GDP. President Trump reversed these trends within his first year in office, proving that the US economy could not absorb the cost of a government controlled economy.
We are one large step closer to falling into a military and diplomatic cooperative interdependence through our newly restrictive relationship with NATO. This has the potential to disastrously depreciate our national sovereignty. This paralyzes the US, with its hands tied behind its back only authorized by the alliance to support Ukraine with defense, not offense, with a ground war, not an air war., ground to air capabilities, not air to air, anti aircraft ground based missiles, not aircraft. By this measure, Ukraine was never supposed to win the war. The soldiers courageously augmented their American training by the shear drive for genuine independence from Russia, by their military ingenuity, and by the awesome degree of solidarity amongst the Ukrainian people. They are also winning this war by the strength, courage, and credibility of their leader, Zelensky. The last thing the global elites want is a strong and successful sovereign democracy between the Communist East and the Socialist West.
Obama, a “Constitutional Scholar”, knows full well that the real basis of our individual freedoms is the public’s belief in their guarantor, God of the Bible. As he encouraged and supported the globalist elitist public school teachers and college professors in their indoctrination of our children to loosen their faith in God at a time when their most pressing questions about life should have included consulting the Bible, his real objective was to systematically erode public support of the religious basis of the Constitution. This strategy has been working extremely well. Fewer and fewer college graduates have any idea of what constitutes their citizenship, the defense and protection of the US Constitution. Once the US Constitution is defeated in the court of public opinion, we have lost our individual freedoms and the country has lost its genuine sovereignty. Their strategy is working very well at this time. Biden is merely the puppet protecting and advancing this agenda. Our children’s understanding of the basis and origin of their freedoms had always been a cultural deterrent against the socialist and communist conquest from within our borders.
Desperate globalists will use any crisis to advance their agenda. COVID 19 was the quintessential crisis that enabled the globalists to assume the power of controlling individual behavior by fear-mongering and deception. Several leading immunologists around the world called their myths into question from the beginning. They recognize the probability of viral infection to be the logical result of exposure to the concentration of the virus and the duration of the exposure. In January of 2020, it was well known that the virus was a Coronavirus, not a germ from outer space. One would logically assume that the recommendations from leading immunologists and practicing physicians around the country would have been taken into account. One would logically assume that our federal health agencies would defer to them first, and then to international agencies second or third after leading experts around the world. As I wrote in March of 2020, it was already apparent that this was not going to happen.
Intentional Campaign of Deception
Biden’s rhetoric could only make sense to the communist activist who believes that the free world has failed him. This is wholly born of economic envy. This is the torch carried by those who were instilled to believe that the world owes you a living, or else someone has stolen your “fair share”. These are the people that believe that there exists a moral imperative for those who earned their living legally to provide for “the common good”. What is the common good? To the communist, it is an equal share of wealth, no matter how derelict and unproductive the individual might be. Biden has managed to mesmerize the young people into believing they are owed a living regardless of their personal economic decisions. He is their ultimate candy man. He is leading them down the path of voting for the greatest government sponsored theft in the history of the world. Biden knows that the average young person in the United States does not have a clear realization of financial magnitude, of the difference between $10,000 paid once in exchange for $1,000 taken biweekly. He is enticing them with a piece of candy compared to the economic enslavement that they will have signed up for that will grant close to half of theirs and their children’s paychecks back to him. He will have all of them convinced that the government will provide for them better than they could have if the money was theirs to spend. Those living paycheck to paycheck will have been hit the hardest, namely the lower middle class of income. They will be hit hard twice, first with the portion of their paycheck stolen, then with inflation resulting from the tremendous acceleration of the printing of the US dollar and its intentional devaluation. Eventually, the tax revenue from business profit will hit a low plateau, incentivizing the government to raise taxes on the individual even more. As this cycle of impoverishment goes on, the government will make the case for controlling prices and put the final squeeze on those that thought it was a good idea to start a business. This is all intentional for the purpose of creating a global economy that is controlled by a handful of elites at the very top of the global food chain. This is a perfect recipe for global economic declines and widespread impoverishment, creating famine and disease.
Biden knows full well how he is deceptively labeling conservatives as extremists. He knows he is referring to “democracy” as the ability of a single political party to loosen the voting laws to allow for illegal votes to guarantee their victory. He has totally buried the definition of democracy to achieve his political goal. Biden will have died well before all these economic results will have come to bear, but he will be recognized as the principal guarantor of this communist contract with the United States.
Weaponization of Federal Government against All Political Opposition
Probably the most damaging aspect of this global elitist conquest is their ability to influence Obama and his administration to disregard our Constitutional laws and values in order to defeat the opposing political party. I and a few other million people knew back then that the gloves were off and the rule book was tossed. The FBI, IRS, and the State Department, along with other federal agencies were all weaponized to go after Trump and then key officers in his administration, in complete disregard of laws and protocols designed to protect individuals from illegal surveillance, search, and invasion of privacy. This was done deliberately with many layers of coverup along the way.
The global elitist plan is to sway public opinion against their political opposition, to demonize them and finally criminalize them, to rid themselves of this kind of opposition for good. This is the historical struggle of the third world, not the United States. The political stability of the United States had been the envy of the world. While they experienced military and civilian coups, the US was having trusted elections between two civil parties, respecting existing laws and prioritizing a reverence for justice, while protecting individual rights and freedoms. Obama, sanctioned by the UN and the global elites, appointed the most radical, liberal judges to the appellate and circuit level of the judiciary system and politicized our federal agencies. A lion share of our federal workers had traditionally been democratic because of the vested interest in the allocation of tax revenue. Under Obama, they somehow sensed a green light to view their political opposition as a serious threat to their existence. Being primed through Obama’s eight years in office, it wasn’t hard to find the actors that were willing to break all the rules and shift their loyalty to the Obama administration rather than the Constitution.
Can we afford to wait?
Absolutely not!!
Constitutional Conservative Activism
In the absence of all our national deterrents to conquest, the only thing this country has left is us-constitutional conservatives! Yes. This is a call to a civilized, educated, proactive response that our children will have been proud of for generations to come. The threat of conquest by communist regimes is a fact of life in an imperfect world. We must adapt and rise to the occasion! The occasion of educating our families, the occasion of answering to the insane rhetoric with logical answers to the “why?” and “why not?” questions, and to teaching relevant US and world history. They must be taken out of the public schools, which cannot be improved because the entire US Department of Education is liberalized and unable to teach a relevant curriculum. This must be a cultural grassroots organizational proactive response that liberal globalists will not be able to ignore. The this must not only be a political response. Votes and financial support of the republican party alone will not bring about the deterrence to the weaponization of our government against the conservative. This must be a spiritual and, as a result, a cultural response. Our message to republican politicians is that they will force us to create a constitutional conservative party whose mantra is to restore our government agencies to serve and support individual and religious freedom. The lines of governmental control and intimidation must be redrawn immediately. The constitutional conservative must expect to be supported and served rather than vilified and falsely labeled and framed as an extremist enemy of the country. We must re-instate religious freedom as the freedom to practice our religion in public without forcing the public to agree or practice themselves. We must re-instate the definition of extremism as espousing values radical to the historical cultural norm and not using the political bully pulpit to target major sectors of the country. We must help our representatives realize how much support they have in resisting the globalist liberals.
The Why Questions
Why are the republicans trying to give tax breaks to the rich?
The people whose personal income are above the middle class get taxed to a higher proportion than the middle class. A higher proportion of this class own businesses which also get taxed to the degree that the government does not want them to make a profit. The higher the business tax rate, the less the incentive to make a profit. Profit is what businesses use to keep valuable employees who add to the business. It is what businesses use to improve existing products and create new ones. It is what businesses use to compete against one another and more importantly against foreign businesses. If an entire industry in the US fails to keep their profit margins high enough, they eventually cannot afford the upgrades in technology to compete around the world. A perfect example of this is the textile industry. Our competition in China and Southeast Asia upgraded to robotics at a time when our textile companies could not afford to retool and retrain employees. While their costs after installing their robots went down, ours went up with the cost of employee benefits like health and life insurance, and the cost of maintaining payroll accounts. All of our textile companies went out of business very quickly and every garment people bought at Walmart, Target, and Kohl’s was made in China, Indonesia, or Central America. The textile industry was never bailed out. We lost it overnight. The auto industry, everybody knows, was. Why? It was calculated by the economists that support the Obama administration that our economy could not absorb the shock of losing the auto industry in terms of unemployment and immediate increases in auto prices. Logically, if the US government wants to maintain a sustainable tax base, they would feed and water their best source of revenue, corporate income tax. Many Americans don’t realize what it takes to do that. Profit is what assures employees they will have a job next month. Profit is what insures their health and life insurance will be affordable. Up to recently, it also assured lifelong employees that they will have an additional source of retirement income besides the limited social security. Profit is what our companies use to stay competitive around the world. Profit is what is used to keep the best front line employees and the best managers and executives. Talent and experience is a limited commodity. Just as in sports, talented and experience have a significant impact on the value of the team. In a free economic society, the private sector pays for quality decision making that can trash or increase the value of the company. In a free market society, profit is the actual and necessary wealth that is passed on to all members of that society in terms of standard of living, meaning the cost of living and the discretionary income of the average household. The most direct effect the government has on employment and employment compensation, or our standard of living, in general, is the business tax rate. Limiting this rate assures the private sector will maintain enough profit to create more profit. When the country’s workforce is paid from profit, it avoids the need to create employment that is paid for out of the private individual’s paycheck.
When a person in the United States buys resources and pays for the process to combine them in such a way as to sell the finished product for the profit that the free market determines, that profit does not belong to the government. If enough buyers are willing to pay a certain price, the resultant profit belongs to the seller. The business tax, if applied fairly across the industry will not give any one seller a competitive advantage within the country. If the government applies costly restrictions, it will slow and impede the smaller startups and suffocate the entire industry. The higher the business tax and costly restrictions, the less competition from small startups, the higher the prices, and eventually, the less productivity from the larger enterprises. This is economics 101. The more paychecks paid from individual taxes and the less people paid from private profit, the more everyone is taxed and impoverished. This is the government that boasts that employment is up without disclosing the proportion of employees becoming dependent on your taxes is the one that is out to steal your lunch literally. Suffocating the free market and business competition always results in economic depression and impoverishment.
In a society of economic envy, those that have chosen to limit their potential by limiting their education and opportunities for harder learning become envious of those that have made tougher choices. Rather than accepting an understanding of the value of skill, ability and knowledge, they focus on the difference in compensation alone. They convince themselves that if profits were passed onto them equally, they would make as much as someone with more decision making responsibility or simply someone with more talent and experience. They have no concept of how they would operate their own business in order to compete in the world. They emotionally brand the disparity in income as immoral. That very same person, having been promoted into management the next day would protest vehemently if the company decided to pay management the same as he was making the day before. Today, because of the abundance of educational attainment and its lack of ability to predict quality performance, it is the minimal standard of employment compensation in the private sector which relies on real world results to compete.
Why Not Have The Government Force Companies To Equalize Compensation?
Their solution is for the government to intimidate and coerce the private sector to do just that. The government will contract to companies who surrender in such a way as to limit and eventually force the independent ones out of business. Eventually, if you want to drive a truck for a living, you will have to be credentialed and employed by the government. If managers are forced to pay everyone in the same work category regardless of the worker’s work ethic and quality of work, you will end up with a de-motivated workforce that struggles to meet even the most minimal of work standards. This is what happens in our healthcare industry, in our classrooms, and in government contracted companies. More and more of the most talented and experienced are leaving these professions in recent years. In the technology sector, our competitive edge is being eroded for largely the same reason, leaving us desperately dependent on foreign nationals to do our research and development. You might do your neighbor a favor every now and then, but few would do it consistently without any recognition. You might do your employer a favor every now and then, but not many will do it consistently without any expectation of an increase in compensation. Merit based pay has now become immoral in liberalized government subsidized industry. As a result, there is little motivation to build a career, instead its about keeping a very specific skill set that is currently in demand, limiting the work ethic to merely maintaining a job. More and more college graduates are limiting their professional aspirations to landing a job as opposed to building a career. These are two very different paths! The motivation to build a career is extremely more powerful than that to find a well paying job. It takes career minded individuals to be invested and motivated enough to reflect on the current experience and reality of their industry to learn new material and contribute innovations. This can only occur in the context of a sufficient amount of merit based compensation! The ultimate success of a team and a company, its profit, and as a result its stock value, is the only true motive that is able to consistently promote growth and innovation. The same people who make sense of this in sports cannot seem to apply this logic to any other industry!
Economic Freedom vs Economic Enslavement
Only a government which intends to control what is made, what services are rendered, how things are made and done each step of the way until everyone across the country are doing the same things the exact same way can knowingly pave the way to national impoverishment by forcing mediocrity in the workplace. This is not the American dream! It is the socialist dream, one slippery step away from a communist dictatorship. Economic freedom is the ability to choose where and how to work, to seek employment or to start your own enterprise, to work for the government or to work for a private company. This administration is on track to dis incentivizing private employment and to making more and more jobs either directly government jobs or private sector jobs contracted to the government. The more jobs that are in some way paid by the government, the more our workplace values and processes are dictated by a huge array of government agencies. The more radical the government values, the more radical the workplace environment. This is the economic enslavement of the private citizen against their work preferences. As the government decreases discretionary income by constantly raising taxes, it forces people to work longer hours to afford what they could previously. This is economic enslavement. Our young people have no idea what is coming down the pike for them or they simply would not have votes for it. Uncle Sam will very quickly become Father Sam. Future generations will not know what they are missing, as in most of the European socialist countries. Those young people don’t have a clue as to the causes of their country’s impoverishment.
Why Do Conservatives Support Trump so Loyally?
Trump supporters are supporters of the values he has demonstrated in his actions more than his words. He has demonstrated his economic values of incentivizing the free market by lowering business taxes, which increases competition for buyers and lowers prices, increases private discretionary income, and increases business for small business owners. He demonstrated his social values by supporting African American owned colleges and offering help for African Americans to start businesses. His education secretary was all for education vouchers to allow all students and parents to choose their best schools and avoid the abysmal academic standards of the public schools which lead to NO CAREERS! He supported religious freedom that would allow Christians to work and live consistently with their religious beliefs like any other religion in the US. As president, Trump vehemently defended our national sovereignty, and as a result our dearly held individual freedoms, which some in federal government believe is their discretion to allow or not. Behind the scenes, President Trump relied on our military to do whatever they needed to do to prevent Iran from further empowering Al Kaeida, the Taliban, Hamas, and other terrorist groups. He relied on our special forces and members of our intelligence agencies loyal to our Constitution to keep the Houthi rebels from overturning the Yemen government and blocking the Strait of Hormuz which is a major oil route. Once blocked it could trigger a world wide depression, as Iran has threatened a number of times. He also relied on our spies to keep Syria’s dictator Assad from using chemical warfare agents against his own people. President Trump understood that energy independence would keep our energy costs down and our economy up. He did not demonize green energy or support penalizing legislation against it but defended our need to have low cost energy in the form of natural gas as a form of maintaining affordable energy for the private individual in the form of lower gas prices and for the businesses in the form of lower cost of transporting goods. What distinguishes the United States from other countries in the world is the proportion of discretionary income the average individual has to exercise their freedoms with.
The desperately sought after globalist world is the complete opposite. They are in the business of taking freedoms away in order to control the distribution of wealth, thereby impoverishing everyone as the national wealth is quickly consumed. We can’t print money indefinitely. Once we cannot meet our interest payment at the end of our fiscal year, everyone in the world will experience the an unimaginable economic depression which will effectively multiply every other national and diplomatic problem we already have. The United States has never been put in reverse economically, socially, and diplomatically. Only a treasonous agency against our Constitution and sovereignty could do this. Everyone who is being promised free stuff will live to regret their complicity as they become economic slaves to a globalist system from which there is no escape.
Why Mar N Lago now?
Iran wants desperately to achieve nuclear superiority in their region of the world as fast as possible and they smell the political meltdown about to happen in the US. We have special forces and dedicated spies who have risked their lives keeping the Iranians from achieving their horrid goals and keeping our government informed. This administration is desperate to decommission our active spies keeping Iran and North Korea from achieving nuclear military capabilities, and keeping Russia from being able to deploy them while desperate to take Ukraine. Trump has been trying to keep our treasonous Biden regime from getting access to those identities. This is the real reason you see him being protective over those documents. The liberal media would have you believe that it is part and parcel a result of his egomania. Why would a man intelligent enough to fix our economy risk going to prison otherwise?
Former President Trump symbolizes our individual freedoms. Any unconstitutional attack on him by this administration will always be viewed as an attack on any of the millions of constitutional conservatives who believe in national sovereignty and individual rights. An indictment on him for exercising his rights is an indictment on us.
Why is globalization bad?
It is a process that logically calls for our individual rights to be granted by and upon the whims of the United Nations, an organization that is systematically trying to supersede the US Constitution and obligate the United States to become a cooperative nation interdependent in a web of socialism which has already proven to impoverish entire countries very quickly!
My Last Word Of Warning
This is an irreversible path! Once the demand for excellence from a free market is squelched it will be unrecoverable without a depressed population addicted to drugs and alcohol (soon to be called “water”as in “vodka”) suddenly being motivated to sober up. After all the private businesses have failed or been closed down, each generation will be more and more easily controlled, not ever having a clue of what they are missing, like those young people supporting their communist dictators today. This is being sewn amongst the American people today by a savvy group of despot elitists who believe they are saving the world.
You are forfeiting your economic future by taking the candy offered to you today and voting for the power of the candy man to steal your paycheck tomorrow. The consequences of having voted for a government handout that pales in comparison to what is about to be taken will be extremely regretful! Having taken economic freedom for granted, you will be absolutely dismayed when it disappears, having to work in the environment and the capacity the government allows you to work in. You will continue to be dismayed about how your value as a person with a unique set of talents, strengths and abilities will be totally depreciated to a warm body who must work exactly as the next person with behavioral limitations and limitations on speech that engender a depressed workforce. You will be dismayed as to how quickly everyone’s standard of living will equal out to poverty with no options to upgrade as an individual. Economic enslavement is having to work in a fashion and an environment that is not of your choosing for mere survival. This is exactly what you are voting for. It is potentially irreversible for generations to come! Only those who have already experienced this know what you are voting for. But why listen to those who have already lived the tragedy around the corner? Its your vote to remember and regret for the rest of your life, especially those of your children. With no ability to accumulate savings for life and for retirement, do you think your paternal government will award you a comfortable lifestyle in your old age. Take a good look around the world! We look both ways before we cross the street when we believe that we may regret not doing so. Did you notice that fewer people are actually doing that. They actually believe that society will take care of them and all their needs if they continue to cross the street while texting. That is called living a myth. In the US, you have the freedom to vote for everyone to have no choice but to have to live that myth. In the US, you have the freedom to vote everyone’s freedom away!
How Does The Second Amendment Allow Private Citizens To Have “Assault Rifles”?
It is historically proven that the success of the United States in retaining individual economic, social, and religious freedom is attributed to the profound contributions from private individuals themselves. The US Constitution is the basis for the exceptionalism of the country in that it is the only constitution in the world that absolves the citizen from being forced to trust and follow the moral whims of government. No government official of the United States can legally rule over people on the basis of trust or loyalty. No group of government officials have the legal right to force any citizen to act or not act on the basis of trust and/or loyalty. In other words, the caretaker of the home has no legal right to overpower the family. The sole intention was for the US Constitution to prevent any governing body from forcing the people to act or not act against their conscience out of fear and intimidation, provided that the rights of others were not impinged. The ground breaking realization was that the only way to deter an overpowering government was to guarantee that the balance of power would remain amongst those governed as opposed to those governing. The purpose of the US Constitution was not to establish how government is to control its citizens, but rather how government is to preserve their individual rights. The rational basis for this purpose is rooted in the belief that the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness is granted to all people by God and that no government has the right to limit or take them away from a legal citizen. In contrast, socialist governments around the world retain the right to overpower their people and prioritize themselves above their constitution. They tell their citizens what temperature to set their thermostats and at what times to turn the lights off and back on again, but bear no responsibility for the lack of basic protections from crime, lack of energy resources for heat and air conditioning, and for overwhelming income taxes averaging from 50-75% of the individual income! As this spirals out of control, modern European countries will see their relative freedoms limited to simple survival on the way to severe impoverishment.
The logical basis for the second amendment rests in the principle of human nature being that in our imperfect nature as human beings, there is an inevitable propensity for those in power to seek unwarranted control over those not in power for the sake of remaining in control. People eventually become much more dependent on the current governing body for survival and relinquish their personal trust and loyalty to that group of people. Control is logically and necessarily a progressive process. The ugly truth is that the more that is controlled, the more that has to be controlled! In controlling how much power the individual uses, you have to control the types of products and the quantity of the resultant power usage, requiring government imposed restrictions on appliances, transportation, etc. Eventually a power hungry regime gets into the business of redefining basic value words such as democracy, patriotism, and nationalist extremism and into the business of restricting speech and public expression. Then comes the criminalization of the very rights of freedom of expression. This, then establishes the basis for surveilling the public, their financial transactions, their travel, their associations, and communications.
The authors of the US Constitution recognized that the only real deterrent to an overpowering government was to guarantee the balance of power amongst the people governed. They full well recognized that the only genuine way to guarantee that balance was to allow the governed to possess the amount of physical power they felt they needed to deter an intolerable encroachment of government power against them. The red line in the sand is the freedoms granted in the US Constitution. The entire value of the United States rests upon the people’s ability to hold on to those freedoms! That is why the vast majority of legal immigrants came to this country. Today, these are among the most outspoken people in defense of their constitutional freedoms. The only way to deter any government from overpowering its people is for the people to have the freedom to own a formidable amount of deterrence and have the ability to use it. This is the only situation which could logically minimize the chance of having to actually use that kind of force. Out of the collective experience of the founders and factual historical proof throughout the history of the world, military power is the only formidable deterrent. This does not mean that any rogue group of private citizens can target government officials they don’t like or agree with. “An organized and well regulated militia” was intended to mean that the people have the right to organize at some level of consensus and defend their Constitutional rights and freedoms by force if need be. No organized group of people in the United States would risk their lives and that of their families unless the people of the United States as a whole were threatened with an outright government takeover. There would have to be an absolutely genuine threat of a military, economic, or social takeover across the entire country. The authors of this document were well aware of these kinds of government takeovers. Our present day Constitutional conservatives are also well aware of what these kinds of takeovers consist of. In light of this aspect of our imperfect human nature the second amendment was written in support of the main purpose of the US Constitution, is the logical deterrence against an overpowering government.
Any regime which actively seeks to make these facts about human nature and our Constitution controversial become logically untrustworthy. Any regime which continues to communicate in that fashion while knowingly becoming untrustworthy for that reason becomes a formidable and serious threat to the American citizen who has sworn to uphold and defend the Constitution from enemies within or without. So where are we with respect to this issue as a country? You would not be able to tell by following the media. You might look at the demand for AR 15s by Constitutional conservatives. This is probably the closest indicator to how much of a threat the present regime is. I can confidently tell you that this interpretation of our Second Amendment is the greatest threat to the globalist elite seeking to control us from within and without. I can confidently tell you that their loyal media has been introducing more and more controversy into this vital issue. Their steadfast effort to criminalize the AR15 owner and label him or her as an extremist terrorist is an extremely serious threat that no other administration in the history of the United States has ever attempted. They will use the illogical examples of psychotic individuals to try and create a popular justification to confiscate a major form of security from law abiding individuals. This only demonstrates the desperation of an overpowering government.
Why do conservatives believe that the christian religion should be favored by the government?
The logical truth is that everyone has beliefs about what they cannot definitively prove to themselves. What a person believes is part of their identity. It governs their actions and inactions. Religious beliefs govern what a person thinks is right or wrong. In the United States, an individual’s religious beliefs are constitutionally protected. Religious behavior is limited only when it impinges on other’s constitutional rights. This is in sharp contrast to many other countries which legally favor the majority religion against any other, such as in the Middle East.
In the US, you have the freedom to believe whether or not a God exists, and if so, who that God is. You do not, on the other hand, have the freedom to coerce others to believe or behave according to your beliefs. Just as no one has the right to force an atheist to behave as if they believed in a God, no one has the right to force a theist to behave as if they didn’t believe in a God. No one has the right to censor the other’s behavior. Just as seeing or hearing atheist behavior and expression is not an impingement upon a theist’s rights, neither is seeing or hearing theist behavior an impingement upon the atheist’s rights. Just as the atheist has the right to claim that there is no God in public, the theist has the right to claim that there is a God in public.
All things being equal the atheist in the United States has as much religious freedom as the theist. Historically and logically, this reality is only possible because of the nature of the religious beliefs of the authors of the US Constitution. As Christ is not to be forced or coerced on anyone in public or in private, He can be publicly recognized without forcing or coercing the public to believe in Him. Voluntary participation in prayer in public is not recognized to be an act of force or coercion unless the public expression surrounding the event creates that impact. Public force or coercion into prayer is totally contradictory to the foundational principles of the Christian religion.
In light of the truths of this religious freedom granted in the Constitution, participants in government and in the private sector are not censored from behaving and expressing according to their chosen beliefs. Allowing participants to pray at government events in public and express their belief in Christ is not an establishment of religion. The US government requiring participants to recognize Christ and claiming an official belief in Christ as a requirement for citizenship would be the establishment of religion. Just as the atheist has the right to offer the legitimacy of his belief in public, so does the theist. Offering the legitimacy of one’s beliefs in public is not the same as applying force or coercion. Intentionally instilling fear of being disenfranchised comprises coercion. Intentionally instilling fear of financial, social or legal punishment for that belief is coercion. Following through with that fearmongering is force. By enlarge this does not happen to non-Christians in the US as it does to Christians in many other parts of the world.
Any government body or legal entity that encourages or allows the censorship of religious behavior or expression in public or in private is guilty of denying individuals of their Constitutional rights. The conservatives believe that the government should allow voluntary prayer in public. That does not constitute the government favoring the Christian religion unless there are some sort of government sponsored incentives behind it. Tax money should not be spent on incentivizing religious events but should also not be spent on censoring religious events either.
These logical distinctions are exactly what the liberals don’t want our young people to be aware of. They wage an intentional confusion when they defend the public censorship of the Christian religion. They fear the support for religious freedom amongst our young people. They want young people to believe that government has the role of selectively granting that freedom or censoring it.
PRIORITY ACTIONS
How to start a petition
New Networking Platforms
Direct Dialogue with liberal myths and beliefs:” to those that believe…”
Supporting Domestic Self Reliance
Enabling Private Educational Options for Full Time Working Parents
New homeschooling culture-Patriot Leadership Home School Association
Patriot Leadership Bible Fellowship
