The alarm has been sounded for all who can hear it today. Those who cannot are destined to suffer. There are now a very distinguished list of modern patriots who have written books, articles, and have released videos on both mainstream and more protected platforms. There are patriots who are now anonymously risking their lives, their jobs, and their personal security as they blow the whistle on the global power elites and their national affiliates both in government and the private world and resist their initiatives to gain control over ordinary people’s lives. There are elected and non-elected government officials standing up for the Constitution in the face of those hungry for totalitarian control. There are small business owners who have resisted unconstitutional mandates local and federal mandates restricting their right to serve the public legally.
As you read this, there are individuals doing what they can on the local, state, and federal level to resist the encroachment of totalitarian control over their society.
Why are a numbered group of powerful individuals regressing the world into a repressive, economically stagnant global totalitarian state? The answer to this question will form the basis for justifying your defense of the US Constitution.
This activity on the part of the global power elite is no longer a conspiracy theory. It is the largest most evil authentic conspiracy against the free western world, now blatantly disclosed through their own public admission as exposed and described in Glen Beck’s most recent book, The Great Reset. Glen’s masterpiece is titled after the name given to the World Economic Forum meeting of 2020 in Davos, Switzerland. These participants are the wealthiest and most powerful individuals in the world. Very few know what it feels like to have that much wealth and power in your hands except for them. We only have the history of human behavior to query to put theirs into perspective. We could start with the Roman Empire and examine the motives, actions, and results of each empire straight through the British empire. There is not one that did not impoverish the weak and punish the disloyal. There is also not one that contributed to improving the condition of humanity in the world. Each one only sought to engulf and control more of the world given the opportunity. Each one resorted to more and more drastic measures to retain their control.
People who achieve this level of wealth and power do this because they feel that the world will lose its way without their interventions. They feel that they are obligated to force the misdirected lesser people into compliance for the common good, one that is declared by them. So they immorally assume the role of declaring the common good. If it wasn’t for them, the people would suffer more adversity. The genuinely educated person knows that this has been true about human government throughout history. They always see the imperfections of society getting worse without the intervention of their wealth and power. “If the free world was more capable of fixing these problems they would have done so by now.”
How Are They Doing This?
This time it is not one despot dictator after a limited geography but a group of despots claiming the entire world as their playground. As true despots, they bribe individuals and organizations to adopt mythological narratives that motivate individuals to adapt their behaviors out of misconstrued fear. If black lives truly mattered, there would be a demand to increase crime control in the inner city to flush out gang shootings. What we have today is the opposite of what anyone would logically expect. We have a completely federally supported violent, activist group promoting more crime and destruction in their own neighborhoods. There is a huge crisis of a growing number of gang shootings now intentionally targeting each other’s children. There is a new wave of organized looting in most of the large cities across the country. The elites are actively affecting every region of the world in the same direction according to their governance and culture. Any individual with any potential for exerting influence upon the rest of the community who disagrees publicly with their behavioral objectives and moral values becomes a direct threat to them because their goals depend on mass buy in. As the global elites appeal to the shared cultural emotions of the population, they blatantly ignore the facts of each issue, they ignore human history, and they present, what seems to the unaware, a totally illogical decision making pathway. They create crises which promote a desperation for change amongst the weakest sector of the population in order to justify centralizing control of every aspect of governance. If saving lives from COVID were truly the priority, there would have been much more emphasis on allowing FDA recognition and certification of a list of relatively inexpensive, known treatments that could have saved millions of lives around the world.
Now, as the Biden administration has failed on the most important of their signature bills, there seems to be a potential for military conflict against Russia at the Ukrainian border. Coincidentally, as soon as this bill was estimated to fail, we hear news of the Russian military buildup at the Ukrainian border in response to a planned attack against Russia. Our media immediately called it a false flag operation engineered by the Russians to justify their aggression. What motive would Russia have to artificially instigate a military conflict timed to the day to deflect from Biden’s worst failure to his own base? Putin had achieved an enormous economic victory with the Nordstream II pipeline to become operational within months, enabling Russia to be the major source of oil for the European Union. Why would he destabilize the entire country’s economic future at this moment in time unless he was justifiably provoked? I submit to you that the entire mainstream media has censored the provocation and made this crisis appear to be of Putin’s own making. Although Putin has the ambition of reconstructing the former Soviet Union as do many of the Russians living in Ukraine, it would be totally out of character for him to initiate a military invasion at this time. The mainstream media are making it appear as if he is carrying out a pre-planned invasion as the culmination of his military buildup along the border. This does not make sense to the well informed observer.
What the global elitists fear the most is national sovereignty! As per goal 17 of the 17 goal UN Agenda 2030, they want heads of state like Vladimir Zelensky and Vladimir Putin to be loyal to the globalist movement. What better way to promote this in a hurry by provoking a military conflict that neither of them wanted. Ukraine stands divided between a minority of those that want strong ties to Russia and those that want to belong to the European Union. The vast majority of Ukrainians recognize their country to be sovereign and independent. They are divided on the issue of joining the European Union and joining NATO. It is well understood that they are not near eligible to join NATO currently. The purpose of Putin’s gradual buildup along the Ukrainian border was most likely to discourage Zelensky from applying to NATO as per the Minsk II agreements of 2015 signed by both and the Secretary General of the United Nations. By the latest developments of this invasion as of today, they have demonstrated their commitment to their sovereignty in the most powerful way. Against all expectations, they have and are defending their country courageously and in total unity! They have garnered total support from all of the western nations under the exemplary leadership of president Zelensky. Unfortunately, this conflict will probably extend into the coming weeks and possibly months, prompting repeated efforts at coming to the diplomatic table. Putin will most likely continue to escalate his attacks and target Zelensky’s surrender. Popular opinion from both within Russia and within her allies are not making any sort of impact on Putin at this time. On the other hand, Putin has lost a great deal of support from his own people with the growing courageous protests in the streets of Russia. Along with the economic hardship he is bringing to his people, this will play right into the hands of the global elitists who will offer him a way to stabilize his economy and his political standing.
China and Taiwan are next.
One of the most predictable immediate outcomes in the midst of even a threat of conflict between the European Union and Russia is the sharp rise in the price of oil. This favors the globalists in their overall economic and environmental agenda. This would significantly boost the proportion of electric car buyers. How would the global elites accomplish this without leaving their signature on the table? Enter the CIA.
It would be more plausible for our CIA to have infiltrated Ukraine and conduct the false flag operation. They have a long history of interventions in Ukraine. At the end of July, 2014, an independent investigator Bill Blunden on the news blog Counterpunch, writes about how the CIA was operative in Ukraine, encouraging the Neo – Nazis to break from Russia and most likely staging the massacre at the Maidan protests to appear as if they were ordered by the sitting president Yanukovych which did not want to join the European Union. This resulted in Zelensky’s presidency. The protesters were later discovered to have been shot from surrounding snipers and not the police. The very day the voting rights bill failed, Biden makes breaking news of a military threat from Russia against Ukraine and our solidarity with them. Emphasizing our collaboration with NATO, he manages to deflect full attention on his legislative failure. While the complicit media aggressively spreads the impression of an imminent Russian invasion, there remains no evidence of Putin’s intention to invade. Putin had been building a military presence along the border with Ukraine for months as the US had been building military installations in the NATO countries along the border with Ukraine. The mere presence of Russian troops along the border is not an invasion. The presence of Russian troops in the Donbas region is still not an invasion as these areas are not officially part of Ukraine. Russia and Ukraine and the UN had signed a 14 part agreement in 2015 that Ukraine had not implemented and admitted no intention to implement. The Minsk II agreement is what Russia tried to persuade the Ukrainian president to implement in the spring of 2021. In that same time period the US began constructing a military base in Poland just 100 miles from the border with Russia capable of launching nuclear missiles. Just after the attacks within the Donbas, the origin of which was never made known, the Russian troops, labeled as peacekeepers per a speech given by Putin to his parliament, were sent there for the purpose of deterring further independent provocations between the the separatists and the non-separatists within the region. It would not be out of the ordinary to consider that our CIA would take advantage of this particular division to spark a major conflict and draw Putin’s fire as he has been made to believe it would be his last chance to save Russia from being forever dominated by the West. China has already publicly accused the US of “meddling” in the region. Biden’s CIA would not be acting without the blessing of the global elite’s directing his every move. They successfully provoked Putin into taking out Ukraine’s military installations and taking control of their nuclear sites. I wouldn’t be surprised to find Western Ukrainian refugees that are headed to Poland being flown to the US very soon with the justification that Poland could not immediately absorb all of them economically. The most predictable outcome of any military aggression from Russia against Ukraine would be the halt of the Nordstream II operation and the sharp rise in the price of oil, which the US has once again become dependent on. As for the global elites, the hyperinflation of the US dollar and the economic crises it creates for its own citizens and others around the world is an acceptable cost for achieving their goals. I submit that it is not implausible that the elites incentivized our CIA to arrange a series of provocations from the Ukrainians timed for the express purpose of taking the national spotlight away from Biden’s grand legislative failure and bringing it to a crisis that unites Americans across the political spectrum. What these elites did not predict was the unwavering courage, unity, and strength of the Ukrainian military and the speed upon which their president garnered international support.
Our millennials have been well primed to accept this type of inflation as a cost for “saving the planet”. The indoctrination of our young adults have already occurred, enough by 2012 to re-elect Obama and his socialist agenda, and now to completely transform our country into a socialist, weak economy overnight through just a few votes. This indoctrination was intentionally designed and implemented in our schools by the affiliates of these elites. They are totally responsible for the invention of the American candy man, promising free everything with no responsibilities other than a loyalty to the socialist system of economics. The American Psychology Association knows full well at what ages these environmental fallacies can be promoted as seemingly logical half truths, according to the student’s level of experiential naivety.
Why Are They Doing This?
For these global despots, lives and livelihoods lost in the process of centralizing governance amongst the developed world and supporting it in the under-developed world is an acceptable cost for the higher priority of gaining control over the world economy and governance. Why? Because the national economies must be sacrificed for the stability of the world economy. This is the fallacy they truly believe. They also believe that having the ability to choose the winners and losers amongst the private sector will be more effective than allowing the free market to do this. Why? The priority is the promotion of their values and their ability to determine the ‘common good’. Ultimately, in line with human nature, the common good will ultimately turn out to be whatever suits their personal ambitions. Their goal is to ultimately decimate the free market by establishing private-public contracts as the normal way to do business around the world. They full well know that the free market provides a true measure of the value of a product. They full well know that it also is the source of economic competition. But having no control over the products that succeed and ultimately the values those products promote is unacceptable to them. The fallacy is in the issue of wealth creation. Wealth is not a stagnant world commodity. Wealth is the valuation of what is produced. The free market valuation of any product is the result of its scarcity and the free market demand for it. Profit is both the incentive for producing better products and the fuel for making those products. Price is minimized by the number of sellers, which is the foundation of economic competition. Without the true market valuation, its real price, and no incentive to result the right amount of profit, too much government investment at the taxpayer’s expense always results in a product that returns less profit than is required to continue to produce it. The only way the product could continue to be made is if the taxpayers continue to support its production. This is exactly why a wigit that costs $2 in the free market costs $8 to the taxpayer. Competition is eliminated by the government contract with one or a minimal number of sellers. As happened in Venezuela with their oil exports, by government officials manipulating the valuation of their chief economic staple downwards in order to favor the poorer island countries and pocketing a portion of the proceeds, they quickly and very severely impoverished their whole country upon the disclosure of their corruption, causing their dollar to become virtually worthless, even less than during the US depression of 1939. How did this happen? Venezuela experienced a sustained boom in oil production with the help of US oil companies. The country became totally dependent on oil proceeds at the expense of all other sectors of national productivity. Their governance became more and more centralized, demanding 60% of the total equity produced by other companies, until they acquired the dictator, Hugo Chavez. Chavez nationalized and took over the entire oil industry. As the price of oil decreased throughout the 90s, their productivity also declined and as a result, could not afford to give the oil away any longer to other impoverished countries. As a result of fixing the price of oil lower for other countries and by mismanaging the profits during their boom, the country’s economy collapsed with a hyperinflation of 1,495%. With the help of other totalitarian countries Venezuela’s oil sector is now just surviving, but the rest of the country’s economic sectors are totally bankrupt. The globalists, in tandem with the UN, are also actively promoting their values in third world countries simply by enriching their welfare from global organizations such as the IMF, UNESCO and Planned Parenthood. Venezuela is now dependent on the IMF with little chance of revitalizing the rest of their economy any time soon. By increasing welfare and facilitating abortion, you guarantee dependence on outside economic assistance, a weak family culture, and persistent poverty.
Wealth, or the value of everything is in constant flux. It is increased by investment, voluntary private money that is not involuntary unspecified money from taxpayers, and decreased by less investment. Government cannot truly invest because it takes the money from the private sector in the form of taxes to produce the product at a higher than market cost. The means of production, the jobs, are also supported by taxes. Therefore any nationalized industry leads to a lack of wealth production due to a lack of true profitability. This has been demonstrated over and over again throughout history and currently around the world. The despots believe the world would be made more valuable in their eyes by eliminating the free market and controlling valuation itself. They believe they should determine and control what the world produces. Enter the Green New Deal.
The most farcical part of this is that the very economic system that allowed their own businesses to thrive has become the main target of their despotism. Now that they have monopolies around the world, it becomes in their financial interest to cement their equity by making it impossible for other companies to compete with them on their level. They full well understand that leaving the determination of winners and losers up to the free market would produce the maximum possible world economic growth. Yet they believe that controlling the essence of the market, what it is allowed to produce and how it is allowed to function, the values by which it will impact society, is favorable to an otherwise uncontrolled, unpredictable market. They believe that they can result controlled economic growth as most dictators around the world have believed and been proved wrong over and over throughout world history.
Why Is This Bad?
The global elites believe they can defy the natural laws of economics. Just as the farmer cannot dictate what crop he can grow on any particular field and what yield it will result, neither can these elites dictate what products and producers will grow the world economy because they could never predict the future actual needs and desires of the world in its entirety. In full awareness of this, they know they must also be able to control these things also. In order for these things to work, the free market must be extinguished permanently. Any significant profit that is produced in the free market will eventually be outlawed. Seriously limiting world productivity is one of those acceptable costs for moving into a globally controlled economy.
Wealth must be increased faster than it is decreased in order to sustain ANY economy. Most products depreciate over time. The only thing that appreciates is gold, land, art, and antiques, including coins. It is the net increase that sustains the economy. Wealth can only be increased by the successful use of profits, profits that increase the valuation of the means of production and the entities that own it. Increase in wealth can only come from innovation, both in the product and in the means of production. Wealth, then, is increased through the production of more and more valuable products. This is only incentivized through competition, not cooperation. Innovation comes from the empowered valuation of the individual. What the United States has proven throughout history is that an individual can only truly be empowered through the protection of their rights and freedoms. The fallacy that the elites rely on is that individuals indoctrinated to be loyal to an authoritative regime can innovate and help grow the economy as well. The lack of historical proof doesn’t bother them because they believe they are designing an unprecedented economic context.
What is unprecedented will be the total lack of individual passion and freedom to pursue an idea and make a personal contribution to their world. For them, the perfect world is the lack of known problems and the facilitation of basic functions of society according to their imagination. The denial of the basic truth of human nature, that one who is obligated to nurture their home will never appreciate its value as much as one who is personally compelled. It is a fact of human nature that the human was not designed to be loyal to a human authority as a priority above their own God and family. This prioritization can only be achieved by indoctrination through the formative years of childhood. Any ideas beyond the imagination of the elites that do not conform to their chosen goals and objectives will be suppressed and never come to light. It is the suppression of the creative potential of society that is the real cost of totalitarian regimes. That is why they always lag behind the free world in terms of being able to sustain a growing standard of living amongst their people in general. And as one can see through just a short period of time, dictators are claiming lifelong control over their people, as they continue to blame their impoverishment on the free world’s economic system. They are all out to deny that through the short history of the United States, they have been proven and demonstrated to be absolutely wrong.
Centralized governance depreciates the value of the individual and suppresses innovation. The problem with centralization is that the more you control, the more you have to control. That is why it never stops progressing. Take the example of China. The emergence of digital currency that the government can track on the private individual is a level of control still not imaginable in the US. Yet many have no idea how hard it is to stop a regime that seeks to solve crisis after crisis by exerting more and more control over its own citizens. Only the individuals in our country who have escaped such regimes truly understand.
What Stands In Their Way?
Those that are committed to defending and protecting the original genuine interpretation of the US Constitution. Who are these people? They are the ones who understand its value and its cost. They are all the soldiers who fought throughout history to defend it from the outside of the country. They are also the lesser known soldiers who fought to defend it from within the country. It is these lesser acknowledged heroes that are now fighting for it, losing their jobs, their friends, and in many cases their family relationships. They are being persecuted to a degree totally unknown until recently for speaking out publicly, in their individual capacity, against totalitarian mandates, government actions and regulations that stifle the lives and livelihoods of the private sector. These are the laws that commit the livelihoods of our grandchildren for the sake of empowering a small group of power hungry elites around the world. The conservative families that stand and fight for individual rights and constitutional freedoms are what stands in their way. The parents fighting the public school mandates and curriculum, the truckers fighting the same, the conservative media, and the conservative NGOs in the US are what stands in their way.
How Are They Trying To Get Past This?
The globalists are trying to get around this by launching narratives that frame these people as a fringe group of national terrorists out to create anarchy. In so doing, they are trying to build public support against the original genuine interpretation of our Constitution. They are priming the country to either nullify the document or to amend it in order to nullify the guarantee of the balance of power amongst the governed and not the government.
The insistence on maintaining an open southern border at the cost of inflicting physical and economic harm to our own citizens only demonstrates the priority of redefining American citizenship to no longer mean supporting and defending the US Constitution. Obviously this administration’s plan is to grant them full citizenship through some legislative mechanism. Although their first attempt at the voting rights bill to grant non-citizens the right to vote was intended to be a crucial step towards amnesty.
The false narratives in the media on almost every issue is an intentional deception to justify an extreme centralization of our government. No, their astronomical, radical spending bills are not paid for. They would be paid for by levying all sorts of new taxes on the middle and upper economic class for decades to come. The actual objective is two fold. It is an attempt to control our energy consumption on the one hand and to redistribute wealth to the welfare state on the other hand.
None of this agenda could actually have any hope of getting traction without the intense indoctrination of our children in the public school system and in the mainstream media organizations that target them directly like the most popular television channels like Nickelodeon, Disney, and the History Channel. As the US Department of Education is absolutely and singularly dedicated to serving the teacher’s unions, they train and hire radical socialist activists as public school teachers. Unbeknownst to most parents, no amount of parent involvement, even on the school boards could ever change this. This radical agency is fully supported by the US Department of Justice, which is why parents fail in the courtroom.
How Do We Protect And Defend The US Constitution Against This Unprecedented Threat?
There are three crucial steps the grassroots citizens of the united States must take in order to defeat this global threat. First, the only way to remedy our current situation is to enable all parents who are willing to pull their children out of the public schools. They will in essence be defunded. As governor Youngkin of Virginia declared to support the growth of charter schools, I believe he actually regards this as an intermediary step toward education vouchers and full school choice for parents.
Second, the older generation must now establish an effective dialog with our younger generations that explains to them how they have been used and lied to for political votes and decisions that limit their life experience in unimaginable ways. This dialogue must be logical and comprehensive, including timelines and quotes from the radical activists that changed their academic curriculum and social experience. This dialogue must include the true nature and purpose of the US Constitution and the history of assimilation on the part of the immigrants. This dialogue must give our young people much more support for standing up for their freedoms.
Third, establish a dialogue with the illegal migrants within the context of empathy and edification. Explain the innate value of assimilation into the US Constitution and the value of legal immigration status. Impress upon them how valuable they would become to the country if they transitioned to legal status and the legacy it would bring to their families. Explain to them the evolving motives of a socialist administration. It is important to explain to them how they have been taken advantage of in their desperate situation, yet how they are merely transitioning from an impoverished dictatorship to an impoverishing one. Impress upon them how they have the key to saving the entire country’s freedoms.
How likely is the United States to succeed in restoring freedom depends on these 3 steps. These are proactive steps that require special individuals with a special heart for the future of their children and everyone else’s. The solution to the problems in the US is not a political one. It is definitely a cultural one of immense proportions. We must learn to support vigorous debate in our liberal colleges. I truly believe that it is in enacting these steps that the United States will find a more effective generation of patriots.
Links:
There is noticeably a lot to identify about this. I assume you made various nice points in features also.