If you think for one minute that the Democrat machine, with billions, possibly trillions of dollars at stake, was going to allow their ultimate candidate for president go genuinely spontaneous, wholeheartedly truthful, unrehearsed and unscripted, into a make it or break it presidential debate, you live in an immature, inexperienced, and woefully uninformed, emotionally influenced, and dangerously unrealistic world! Apparently, those responsible for the preparation of former president Donald Trump did!
This debate demonstrated the fundamental weakness of a tremendously fractured and disorganized republican party. A layman such as myself realizes that when your adversary has everything to gain even though you feel you may have not as much to lose, common sense directs you to prepare in such a way as to not allow them to gain a single advantage. Your preparation consists of preparing an offense that succeeds against your adversary’s strongest possible defense. That demands an understanding of the adversary’s capabilities, of their tactics when confronted, and of the source of their confidence.
Kamala Harris has made herself a known quantity throughout her legal and political career. She will very effectively say and do whatever she has to in order to achieve her most coveted goals. ‘Reproductive rights’ is her ticket to establishing power over the man that defends the biblical and traditional role of the family. She is out to extinguish his traditional role in the family, his traditional character valuations, and even his motivation to support his family and provide a sanctuary, the family home, the traditional house. This is what makes Kamala the most formidable presidential candidate for the Democratic machine. She is uniquely willing to follow a script that is so full of lies and deceit that only the most radical feminist, Marxist, of despotic women of the Democratic machine would agree to follow.
If Kamala was this capable on her own, we most certainly would have heard from her much more often as vice president, given the inability of the president himself. Her debate performance was Kamala. She prosecuted the mythical misdeeds of Donald Trump with a convincing drama of a seasoned prosecutor. The most important point of this post is that the tactics and the script comes from a source much more capable and powerful than she, and that is the source of her confidence. Make no mistake, the tactics in the script do have a signature, of one who wants to make a hero of the worker who is willing to give up his or her ability to compete in the free market according to their skills, their hard earned accomplishments, their demonstrated talents, and their traditional character values. This is the signature of one who intentionally proclaims every conservative value phrase and intends to use it to accomplish the exact opposite of its original meaning. This is what society commonly refers to as a snake. This is the signature of one who is despotically and successfully running the private economy of the United States to the ground in order to gain the economic cooperation of the young people into becoming dependent on government assistance through every economic milestone, inculcating in them a Marxist system of values that subjugates their individual contributions to that of society, stealing their personal motivation to compete in the marketplace of ideas and innovation. He has successfully created a sustained economic inflation in order to give the young people little choice but to accept the government assistance and the radical values it espouses for spending the money they could have earned on their own!
It is no accident that every negative claim thrown at former President Trump and his constituency is exactly what their own machine has intentionally implemented against them. They have intentionally lied about his words and his actions, and his affiliations. They promote these lies through the media as propaganda designed to justify their actions against him, as in the Jan. 6th speech, and as in the speech he gave regarding the Charlottesville, VA violent protest. They lie about his intentions as President, that he will act as a dictator forcing people to live against their values and beliefs when, in fact, they are planning to overturn Roe vs Wade to force the entire country to make late term nonthreatening abortions available everywhere by paying for it. They are intentionally allowing states to allow illegal immigrants to register to vote in the upcoming election. They are planning, by executive fiat, to allow illegal migrants to become full fledged citizens without assimilating and swearing to uphold and defend the US Constitution as the document we have traditionally recognized to limit the power of the federal government.
Harris was jettisoned with a script of offenses that placed the former president on the defensive, and a list of conservative key value phrases that the script writer intended to deceive the most naïve of our young people. How many of our young people understand the difference between Harriss’s use of the word ‘opportunity’ when she claims to provide an ‘opportunity economy’ and what opportunity really refers to in economics. The script writer knows that the naïve conservative might confuse one with the other. Her idea of opportunity economics is one in which those with a certain level of income get a certain amount of government grants and credits to afford the lifestyle that those who earn a higher level of income do. Those who earn a higher level of income will be taxed more in order for the government to afford those grants and credits. This will force small business owners to shrink their workforce and become hostage to the government’s prescribed values such as DEI and ESG in order to be granted the money to hire a prescribed workforce, one certainly not based on the business owner’s valuation of merit. Opportunity in economics means the freedom to choose a better way to invest your own money, not the government’s. The crucial difference is that opportunity is what results from a competitive free market, the freedom to choose a better product, a better job, a better private investment strategy, etc.
The idea of any administration that claims to “love small business” yet is out to load up on disincentives to invest in the private market and shrink the discretionary income of the middle class is actually intending to control business opportunity across the board by using taxpayer money to help those who align with the administration’s values, providing the space, the building, the utilities, etc… to learn how to manage a small business with those values. This, of course, is to pose an unfair advantage to the existing private small businesses that rely on their customer’s discretionary income.
Harris’s claim to restore law and order is not intended to support and encourage the prosecution of violent crime but rather to radically alter the profile of metropolitan police departments such that they adopt measures to negotiate with criminals in order to provide them free financial support after they’ve committed their crimes. Violent criminals will be apprehended only to be rewarded with food, housing, healthcare, and mental health, at taxpayer’s expense, for the promise of not re-committing their crimes. They will push the narrative that the crimes are committed because of their disenfranchisement in society, not because of deeply engrained mental deficits requiring isolation from society at large, an underground supply of illegal weapons, and the emotional support and influence from the gang lifestyle. The Biden administration has done everything to discourage just those police officers who give their all to protect the innocent, those who actually expect the risk they took to apprehend those violent criminals to be worthy of just prosecution. Not surprisingly, she will encourage and support the prosecution of those who dare to expose and interfere with this outrageous plan. She will impose federally mandated policing protocols and prosecute any that violate those protocols.
This is all according to Obama’s original intention to transform policing across the country by edict and FBI intervention, one department at a time. As some of the more socialist European countries adopt this policing style, this is well intentioned to become a globalist policing style to be eventually imposed upon all the nations. The underlying belief is that society must bare the cost of this great transformation.
This could only work if we could transform murderers into productive citizens that lose their threat to society. The inconvenient truth is that we cannot! A complete understanding of human nature is that within any society, there will always be individuals who develop such an intensity of hatred, fear, and resentment that render them simply unable to imagine a manner of dealing with life except to eliminate the people who they believe to be the cause. as of today, no amount of human intervention has been shown to guarantee that they will not become a repeat offender. The discussion of why that is so is so delicate and controversial that we have not been able to execute it successfully so far.
Nevertheless, let me give this a shot. We can all agree that humans are not designed to be morally perfect. We may all agree that we did not design our own DNA as humans. Therefore, we have not been endowed with the chemistry that leads us to moral perfection but we have been allowed with a chemistry that allows us to choose our morality if we choose to choose it. Humans are the only creatures that are not inherently good because of this higher ability to choose. Raising children affirms our understanding of this freedom of choice as we register their first “no” at the terrible age of two. We see that passively it is much easier to disobey, to defy authority, to give in to temptation to do the wrong thing than it is to do the right thing. Without a positive influence, without meaningful and supportive parental relationships, it becomes much more difficult to choose the more disciplined behavior. So far, most of us can agree on these things. Upon what basis do we as humans choose our behavior? We make these choices upon the sum total of beliefs we have accumulated throughout our life experience. We decide to trust the brakes of a vehicle based on the belief that they are functional. Otherwise we would test them before each trip. We believe the elevator will not drop to the ground based on a belief that it has been working until now and that nothing has happened in between to render it dangerous. We also believe these things will work based on an assumed frequency of failure. So, our beliefs are based on life experience and assumptions. We choose our risks in life based on these assumptions.
Some people believe that a human society can progress morally solely upon its own resources. They believe that most humans inherently choose to do the right thing. They also believe that violent criminals can be rehabilitated solely by societal resources. Yet, today we see that violent crime is exploding amongst the adolescent and young adult population around the world. Life experience should inform us that left to themselves, their belief systems and their assumptions will fail them.
Logically, whenever anything that we rely on is not guaranteed to stay on track, we place guard rails and/or a sensing mechanism that is designed to keep it on track. By historical experience, we, as a human society, were not designed to stay on track reliably. Hence, religion! Humans have always been known to require an imposed belief system designed to keep us on track. As any government decides to absolutely control societal behavior it naturally seeks to neutralize whatever prior belief system supersedes it. A dangerous number of our American population does not agree or take it seriously enough! Yet they have no clue as to how serious a challenge it is to live in a society where government imposes a belief system contrary to their own. The general Christian belief is that our top loyalty is to our God and by His authority we are to respect legitimate, lawful civic authority which does not threaten the ability to live by His values and commands. Any government which seeks to control the individual’s behavior beyond the limits of the US Constitution will threaten this religious freedom. Just as the Jewish people in Germany could not wholeheartedly endorse Hitler’s communism, neither can the Christians in the US endorse socialism. Yet, this is exactly what is being exercised by this present administration, in full awareness of their assault on religious freedom!
American law is based upon the Constitution which prioritizes protecting the individual citizen from being controlled by government except where it infringes upon the Constitutional rights of other individual citizens. American law, rather, is designed to economically incentivize individuals to respect lawful authority and pursue happiness by competing economically. The protection of individual economic freedom is one of the cornerstones of the US Constitution, having resulted in the opportunity that traditional legal immigrants have risked everything to come here for from one generation to the next. It had a recognized inherent value around the world. The globalists are desperately out to extinguish this value in our society by replacing it with an emotional entitlement mentality that is supported socially. Kamala Harris fulfils her role when she repeats and promotes their idea of “fair share”. They have successfully enshrined pure envy as a moral value by having this administration repeating the phrase “fair share” to mean that the average large business characteristically does not pay the taxes the government deserves. It is also used to mean the equal distribution of equity in all its forms regardless of merit. In the United States, the private corporation’s “fair share” of tax burden is the amount that does not unreasonably impinge on corporation’s ability to compete within its industry in the US and the US industry to compete around the world. This administration, in following the globalist agenda seeks desperately to violate this important principle. Until the free market is extinguished, corporate profit is what determines our standard of living and even our ability to defend our sovereignty as a nation! It is unconstitutional to artificially cap the very means of our economic freedom. “Fair share” also means the income that is legitimately, legally earned according to individual merit, not what your highest paid counterpart at work gets paid.
Our young people are trading the value of economic freedom in the way of opportunity for government established entitlement. They are, in the same vein, trading the only belief system in the world that protects them against a tyrannical government for that belief system that will hold them as economic slaves to the global elites, having less and less of their income to save and spend on their own, having less choice of what to eat, where to live and in what kind of abode, where to work and in what capacity. Today, being unaware and unappreciative of the ultimate sacrifices of generations past as they open their refrigerators to choose what to eat and choose where to apply for work upon completion of the degree they chose to pursue, they are taking all these freedoms for granted. Kamala Harris, by introducing price controls and capping corporate profit across our industries, will bring the free market to a grinding halt, creating unemployment largely among the most skilled and experienced workers in every industry. This will bring about the greatest impoverishment of the middle class and subsequently the entire country. The shock amongst our young people that it was upon their own permission that all this transpired will come too late. Only then will they realize that they used their hard won freedoms to permanently remove them.
This is all by design. The debate was merely an opportunity to sell the fake economics as “opportunity economics”, where in reality, individuals that favor the administration will be given large amounts of government assistance to start and run small businesses and be regulated according to DEI and ESG. This money will undoubtedly come from the increased corporate income tax, especially from those entities that refuse to abide by DEI and ESG. Kamalanomics is Bidenomics on steroids, which is the intended hastening of Obamanomics! Obama himself warned the public in a speech where he stated that those companies that resisted his values were going to have a tougher time. Through the deception of narratives, the global elitists, through Barak Obama are successfully bringing the US economy into a position of becoming more and more dependent on other nations for the support of its own. An overwhelming dependence on other economies inevitably erodes national sovereignty as with the member nations of the European Union. As Germany had exhausted its ability to underwrite the socialist economies of Greece and Spain, a globalized interdependence of national economies, the stated goal of the UN Agenda 30 which was signed by Obama, is destined to impoverish the world by impeding each nation’s ability to create wealth.
The values of economic and religious freedom authorized by our Constitution come from the strong influence of the biblical beliefs of the founders. The reason that “social conservatives” are still passionately adamant about defending these freedoms is that history has demonstrated their absolute success in the face of the abject failure of socialism and communism. I also believe that these values succeed because God allows them to.
There is only one solution: the only solution that has ever worked in the United States. To believe that those of us that understand the necessity of preventing this transformation to socialism through intentional and despotic deception can be achieved by ourselves is to dispel the reality that the success of establishing and defending freedom in this country has never been accomplished without fervent prayer, and a total resolve to faithfully rely on Christ to lead our steps and direct our communication, to give us the moral courage to do the right thing and stand for Him while at the same time defending our Constitution! There is an abundance of incontrovertible evidence of this in the historical personal letters of our founders and of our veterans in the face of every challenge to our individual freedom and national sovereignty.
